Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #6270
| From | BartC <bc@freeuk.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: First Program with Python! |
| Date | 2016-02-11 00:15 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <n9gjld$3iu$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <56ee81f0-8542-49e5-a177-c7794f2d48d7@googlegroups.com> <n9ct09$phe$1@dont-email.me> <5ef3721a-7b0f-4dfd-8dbf-fac4a7172b94@googlegroups.com> <n9fg1k$jke$1@dont-email.me> <n9gb6u$1m5$1@dont-email.me> |
On 10/02/2016 21:51, Richard Heathfield wrote: > On 10/02/16 14:07, BartC wrote: >> On 10/02/2016 00:32, Öö Tiib wrote: >>> On Tuesday, 9 February 2016 16:30:19 UTC+2, Richard Heathfield wrote: >>>> On 09/02/16 14:11, anitagoyal571@gmail.com wrote: >>>> > Python is an interpreted language. >>>> > Interpreter is a program that converts the high-level program we >>>> > write into low-level program that the computer understands. >>>> >>>> That sounds more like a compiler to me. >>> >>> Good catch. AFAIK Python is simply a programming language without >>> requirement that it *must* be interpreted. There even are some >>> JIT-compiling Python 3 implementations like PyPy and Pyston. >>> >> >> PyPy is such a complex implementation that probably no one knows for >> sure exactly what it is. > > That's as maybe, but the point at issue is not whether Python is an > interpreted language; the point at issue is the very definition of an > interpreter. The OP said that an "Interpreter is a program that converts > the high-level program we write into low-level program that the computer > understands", and that's /not/ an interpreter -- it's a compiler. That hasn't been put very well. And you're right that the quote would fit a 'compiler' better. But interpreters do generally convert human-readable source code into a a more efficient internal form, if performance is of any interest. Then the quote isn't so far off. -- Bartc
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
First Program with Python! anitagoyal571@gmail.com - 2016-02-09 06:11 -0800
Re: First Program with Python! Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-02-09 14:30 +0000
Re: First Program with Python! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-02-09 14:35 +0000
Re: First Program with Python! Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-02-09 19:06 +0000
Re: First Program with Python! Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2016-02-09 16:55 -0800
Re: First Program with Python! Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-02-10 09:20 +0000
Re: First Program with Python! Kaz Kylheku <330-706-9395@kylheku.com> - 2016-02-15 16:49 +0000
Re: First Program with Python! Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2016-02-09 16:32 -0800
Re: First Program with Python! BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-02-10 14:07 +0000
Re: First Program with Python! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-02-10 16:24 +0100
Re: First Program with Python! BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-02-10 16:55 +0000
Re: First Program with Python! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-02-11 00:18 +0100
Re: First Program with Python! BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-02-11 00:07 +0000
Re: First Program with Python! Kaz Kylheku <330-706-9395@kylheku.com> - 2016-02-15 16:58 +0000
Re: First Program with Python! Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-02-10 21:51 +0000
Re: First Program with Python! BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-02-11 00:15 +0000
Re: First Program with Python! Kaz Kylheku <330-706-9395@kylheku.com> - 2016-02-15 16:46 +0000
Re: First Program with Python! BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-02-15 17:31 +0000
Re: First Program with Python! Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-02-15 20:16 +0000
Re: First Program with Python! BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-02-15 22:45 +0000
Re: First Program with Python! Kaz Kylheku <330-706-9395@kylheku.com> - 2016-02-16 03:40 +0000
csiph-web