Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #6095
| From | Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: Read again about my objection about C++ and C |
| Date | 2015-12-30 19:48 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <n61ca9$mjc$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <n6188g$6ki$1@dont-email.me> <n618tb$9as$1@dont-email.me> <n619kh$c61$1@dont-email.me> <3bed0922-bb93-464d-9f44-aa66f28c134d@googlegroups.com> <n61bsh$l0n$1@dont-email.me> |
On 30/12/15 22:41, Ramine wrote: > On 12/30/2015 11:28 AM, Öö Tiib wrote: >> Your own argument is stupid. >> >> It is irrelevant for a user of real-time critical incorrect program >> what way it burns down: by giving incorrect answers or by throwing >> out run-time errors. >> >> Developer can compile with gcc -ftrapv option if he wants integer > > > Read here, the -ftrapv is not good: Translation: you once read something that you interpreted as meaning that -ftrapv is not good. Well, I once read that Elvis is alive and well and flipping burgers in an Alabama diner. So what? <snip> -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Read again about my objection about C++ and C Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-12-30 18:50 +0000
Re: Read again about my objection about C++ and C Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2015-12-30 11:28 -0800
Re: Read again about my objection about C++ and C Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-12-30 19:48 +0000
Re: Read again about my objection about C++ and C Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-12-30 19:51 +0000
Re: Read again about my objection about C++ and C Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-12-30 20:07 +0000
Re: Read again about my objection about C++ and C fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-12-30 11:34 -0800
Re: Read again about my objection about C++ and C Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-12-30 19:41 +0000
Re: Read again about my objection about C++ and C Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-12-30 19:51 +0000
Re: Read again about my objection about C++ and C Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-12-30 20:06 +0000
Re: Read again about my objection about C++ and C Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-12-30 20:06 +0000
csiph-web