Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #5475
| From | Michael Griffin <mrmisticismo@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: Telnet Sequence Negotiation |
| Date | 2015-05-28 23:35 -0500 |
| Organization | n/a |
| Message-ID | <mk8qah$iea$2@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <mk6ivg$cnj$1@speranza.aioe.org> <hXR9x.13531$QA3.1685@fx18.iad> |
On 5/28/2015 11:30 PM, Daniel Pitts wrote: >> Lets see if this reply will post this time :) >> >> https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/231866 even through it's >> Microsoft, it has a very good layout of the negotiation sequences. >> >> Scroll down to the middle of the page where the heading is: >> >> Associated with each of the these commands are various possible >> responses: >> >> Basically if you send a DO or DON'T and get a reply, then you should >> change the settings according to the response. >> >> But you want to track responses sent, vs responses received. you don't >> want an endless loop of you -> Them -> you -> them again. >> >> If you send a query, get a response for that item, then cut it there. >> If you receive query, reply back, then cut it there. >> > > Yep, that's basically what I wrote. Only and always send a message if > you are trying to make the state change, or are acknowledging a state > change. > Perfect, then you should be all set.
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Telnet Sequence Negotiation Michael Griffin <mrmisticismo@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-28 03:18 -0500
Re: Telnet Sequence Negotiation Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2015-05-28 21:30 -0700
Re: Telnet Sequence Negotiation Michael Griffin <mrmisticismo@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-28 23:35 -0500
Re: Telnet Sequence Negotiation Michael Griffin <mrmisticismo@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-28 23:35 -0500
csiph-web