Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #5425
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: fat32 and boot sector |
| Date | Thu, 7 May 2015 13:18:18 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 15 |
| Message-ID | <mig6mp$8rd$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <midq6g$51j$1@dont-email.me> <fl7lkahegvmbj3lbqpplp20chr7t6k9q6k@4ax.com> <mie9vg$2f1$1@dont-email.me> <16elka5pl7gu314o4a47osonkl127lrak6@4ax.com> <mieg8v$a79$1@dont-email.me> <mfhlka5fkhj3n44vinhofdh77b4ikduudq@4ax.com> <miemr9$279$1@dont-email.me> <t11mka5c13it483l7m2tpaap4rrunkp8a3@4ax.com> |
| Injection-Date | Thu, 7 May 2015 17:17:13 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="7ed9f20cdc4939cf847cd396823cb5b9"; logging-data="9069"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX199gXT8ttM4EJ+WDKGYx6sq" |
| X-MimeOLE | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.3959 |
| X-RFC2646 | Format=Flowed; Original |
| X-Newsreader | Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.3959 |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:CQe7XctKqYI/2CH71ajNmLLnoQ8= |
| X-Priority | 3 |
| X-MSMail-Priority | Normal |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.programming:5425 |
Show key headers only | View raw
"Robert Wessel" <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:t11mka5c13it483l7m2tpaap4rrunkp8a3@4ax.com...
> The last eight bytes of the partition table entry are two 32 bit,
> little endian numbers, representing the first sector number and the
> number of sectors in the partition. There's no need to multiple by
> 512, unless you want to get a byte count.
Is the partition data concerning C/H/S pertinent for any reason? Or is
it safe to ignore?
Bill
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
fat32 and boot sector "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-05-06 15:32 -0400
Re: fat32 and boot sector Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-05-06 18:30 -0500
Re: fat32 and boot sector "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-05-06 20:01 -0400
Re: fat32 and boot sector Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-05-06 20:07 -0500
Re: fat32 and boot sector "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-05-06 21:49 -0400
Re: fat32 and boot sector Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-05-06 21:24 -0500
Re: fat32 and boot sector "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-05-06 23:41 -0400
Re: fat32 and boot sector "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-05-06 23:42 -0400
Re: fat32 and boot sector Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-05-07 01:23 -0500
Re: fat32 and boot sector "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-05-07 13:18 -0400
Re: fat32 and boot sector Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-05-09 00:01 -0500
Re: fat32 and boot sector JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2015-05-08 00:26 +0700
Re: fat32 and boot sector "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-05-07 14:17 -0400
Re: fat32 and boot sector JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2015-05-09 21:49 +0700
Re: fat32 and boot sector Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-05-09 00:03 -0500
Re: fat32 and boot sector JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2015-05-09 21:55 +0700
Re: fat32 and boot sector Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-05-09 11:43 -0500
Re: fat32 and boot sector JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2015-05-10 16:05 +0700
csiph-web