Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	"Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.programming
Subject	Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess
Date	Wed, 17 Sep 2014 22:29:26 -0400
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines	13
Message-ID	<lvdg2a$b53$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<lv2rp2$e89$1@speranza.aioe.org> <k9-dnWgbP_BLeIvJnZ2dnUVZ8iednZ2d@bt.com> <lv850u$kgq$1@speranza.aioe.org> <auqdne867dIA0YTJnZ2dnUVZ7qkAAAAA@bt.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host	AL9q14/TE3LAZnoHB5UTDQ.user.speranza.aioe.org
X-Complaints-To	abuse@aioe.org
X-MimeOLE	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.4913
X-RFC2646	Format=Flowed; Response
X-Notice	Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
X-Newsreader	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.4657
X-Priority	3
X-MSMail-Priority	Normal
Xref	csiph.com comp.programming:4792

Show key headers only | View raw

"Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> wrote in message 
news:auqdne867dIA0YTJnZ2dnUVZ7qkAAAAA@bt.com...

> Has this thread resolved your confusions ?

    Not really. It was much talk about how bad C was. I will continue to 
search though. I just need to know the compiler better and I thought someone 
else might.

Bill

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-09-13 21:41 -0400
  Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2014-09-14 09:14 +0200
    Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-09-14 15:31 -0400
      Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2014-09-14 21:38 +0200
        Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-09-14 22:05 +0100
          Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2014-09-15 09:40 +0200
            Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-09-15 11:51 +0100
              Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2014-09-15 13:49 +0100
              Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2014-09-15 17:16 +0200
                Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-09-15 22:23 +0100
                Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2014-09-16 10:44 +0200
                Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-09-16 00:18 +0000
          Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2014-09-15 06:18 -0500
        Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-09-15 14:23 -0400
          Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2014-09-15 21:08 +0200
            Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-09-15 19:32 -0400
          Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2014-09-15 21:07 +0100
            Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-09-15 21:48 -0400
  Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess Jongware <jongware@no-spam.plz> - 2014-09-15 10:57 +0200
  Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2014-09-15 14:06 +0100
    Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-09-15 21:50 -0400
      Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2014-09-17 09:54 +0100
        Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-09-17 22:29 -0400

csiph-web