Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming > #4613

My final words...

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Hello,


Here is my final words about my scalable RWLocks...

So you have noticed with me that to scale my scalable RWLocks
you have to use a distributed memory configuration like in
NUMA systems, and on the reader and writer part of my scalable RWLocks 
you have to use more expensive processing, that means you have
to transfer data in parallel from the distributed memory to the CPUs,
cause this memory transfers from distributed memory to
the cores is more expensive than the cache-line transfers from one core 
to the other that i am generating inside my sclable RWLocks algorithms, 
so this will make the parallel part much bigger than the serial part so 
this will make my scalable RWLocks algorithms much more scalable, and 
this is good, that's the same for hardisks, you have to distribute your 
hardisks , and use multiple hardisks an access them in parallel,this 
also will make my scalable RWLocks  more scalable, and this is good.

So as you have noticed my scalable RWLocks are still useful
and good.



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

My final words... Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-06-14 17:59 -0700

csiph-web