Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #3902
| From | aminer <aminer@toto.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads, comp.programming |
| Subject | About Amdahl's law 1 ... |
| Date | 2013-10-10 13:08 -0700 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <l36mub$7to$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Hello, But how can we use the Amdahl's law to predict scalability ? You can not use the Amdahl's to predict the exact scalability, i think , and i have explained it to you that the Amdahl's laws in parallel computing gives you the scalability in the worst case contention scenario , so the Amdahl's calculation in parallel computing looks like the calculation of the worst case complexity in computer science, so it can help to give the scalability of the worst case contention scenario, so that help also to predict worst case scalability, and if the serial part have not a constant running time and the parallel part have not a constant runnning time you can try to find and choose a maximum bound of the time to run the serial part and a maximum bound of the time to run the parallel part and do the Amdahl's calculation and this will give you the scalability for the worst case contention scenario, so the scalability will be equal or greater than the scalability that you will find with the Amdahl's equation. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdne.
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
About Amdahl's law 1 ... aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2013-10-10 13:08 -0700
Re: About Amdahl's law 1 ... aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2013-10-10 13:57 -0700
Re: About Amdahl's law 1 ... Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-10-10 19:14 +0100
Re: About Amdahl's law 1 ... aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2013-10-10 14:45 -0700
Re: About Amdahl's law 1 ... Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-10-10 20:56 +0100
Re: About Amdahl's law 1 ... aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2013-10-10 14:30 -0700
Re: About Amdahl's law 1 ... Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2013-10-10 23:12 -0500
csiph-web