Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #3793
| From | aminer <aminer@toto.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads, comp.programming |
| Subject | About lockfree queues ... |
| Date | 2013-09-24 19:16 -0700 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <l1t6hd$2pr$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Hello, I have wrote before this: "I have come to an interresting subject about lockfree queues, if you take a look at those lockfree queues, like in transactional memory, if the data have changed those lockfree queue retries and loop again, but this (lockfree) mechanism generates a lot of cache-coherence traffic, so i will not advice this lockfree mechanism, so how can we do it ? you can take a look at the MCS queue Lock , i think they are doing it like a waitfree linklist that doesn't spin and that reduces a lot the cache-coherence traffic, other than that if your memory manager is not optimal and uses a lockfree mechanism and generates a lot cache-coherence traffic, so you have to use a freelist to lower the cache coherence traffic." But you have to know even that you are using spin waits inside lockfree algorithms that genrates a lot of cache-coherence traffic , you have to know that you can avoid this problem and make your lockfree queue more efficient by adding an exponential backoff to you lockfree mechanism using a PAUSE asm instruction followed by a Sleep(0) to not freeze the computer and this way , like with the Spinlock, it will reduce the cache-coherence traffic and make your lockfree queue more efficient,. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
About lockfree queues ... aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2013-09-24 19:16 -0700 Re: About lockfree queues ... aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2013-09-24 21:09 -0700 Re: About lockfree queues ... aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2013-09-24 21:34 -0700
csiph-web