Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming > #2531

Re: Theorem automated proving P = NP A proposition

From Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Newsgroups comp.theory, sci.logic, comp.programming
Subject Re: Theorem automated proving P = NP A proposition
Date 2012-11-28 15:11 +0100
Organization albasani.net
Message-ID <k9562p$ksm$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink)
References <e02469aa-911a-4a72-88d4-13a2f96adc7e@me7g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


 > (** QED stands for "Quid erst demonstration". This = Latin for "What
 > was to be shown." *)

The above doesn't sound latin, but I am not
an expert. I find instead:

quod erat demonstrandum
quod esset demonstrandum
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quod_erat_demonstrandum

And humorously:
quo errat demonstrator
quod est dubitandum

Bye

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Theorem automated proving P = NP A proposition Martin Musatov <marty.musatov@gmail.com> - 2012-11-28 04:59 -0800
  Re: Theorem automated proving P = NP A proposition Jongware <jongware@no-spam.plz> - 2012-11-28 14:43 +0100
  Re: Theorem automated proving P = NP A proposition Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2012-11-28 15:11 +0100
    Re: Theorem automated proving P = NP A proposition Frederick Williams <freddywilliams@btinternet.com> - 2012-11-28 14:39 +0000
      Re: Theorem automated proving P = NP A proposition Martin Musatov <marty.musatov@gmail.com> - 2012-11-28 12:51 -0800

csiph-web