Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming > #2484

Re: linked list language

Show all headers | View raw

Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> writes:
>
>>     Does anyone have an opinion on whether linked lists are easier
>> to do in C or C++?
>
> That's an odd question.  C++ has standard container types including a
> list type, so in that sense it's easier in C++: there's nothing to do
> other than use them.

    I don't know what container types or list types mean. I was going to 
think of a second language after C and considered Perl. Whew. Too much for 
me. C++ is probably most C like.
    I think I frustrate alot of programmers on usenet because they're 
professionals. I'm a hobbyist and have to learn C as I go and algorithms 
forget it. What kind of programming can you do without them. I have to move 
at my own pace. But I'll never become a CS student professionally. I'll look 
up list container.

Bill

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

linked list language "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-11-14 19:23 -0500
  Re: linked list language Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-11-15 01:30 +0000
    Re: linked list language "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-11-14 20:58 -0500
      Re: linked list language treetaxi <noreply@treetaxi.invalid> - 2012-12-02 22:22 -0700
        Re: linked list language "Aaron W.  Hsu" <arcfide@sacrideo.us> - 2012-12-03 01:53 -0500
    Re: linked list language "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-11-14 21:06 -0500

csiph-web