Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #10185
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-09-08 12:50 -0700 |
| References | (2 earlier) <qjgo8o$2ir$1@news.albasani.net> <qjgq7t$jal$1@dont-email.me> <qjil67$l73$1@dont-email.me> <86sgprskrj.fsf@example.com> <qjs4k3$r31$1@news.albasani.net> |
| Message-ID | <d6dfd9a5-b228-49b4-b206-bdf4dba08a0e@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Is MIX utterly silly? |
| From | luser droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> |
On Saturday, August 24, 2019 at 2:53:42 PM UTC-5, Peter Percival wrote: > Louis Valence wrote: [Knuth:] > > > > One of the principal goals of my books is to show how high-level > > constructions are actually implemented in machines, not simply to > > show how they are applied. I explain coroutine linkage, tree > > structures, random number generation, high-precision arithmetic, > > radix conversion, packing of data, combinatorial searching, > > recursion, etc., from the ground up. The programs needed in my > > books are generally so short that their main points can be grasped > > easily. People who are more than casually interested in computers > > should have at least some idea of what the underlying hardware is > > like. > > I agree! But no computer is or was like MIX. > Yes, there most certainly were. Even weird stuff like saving the return address in the subroutine's 'return' instruction, this was done on the PDP-1. A good source for the wide diversity of 60s and 70s computers is Bell and Howell, Computer Structures. MIX is of course a "mix" of features from various old machines, so it isn't exactly like any of them. But every weird thing it does is a reflection of some actual hardware that really did exist.
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is MIX utterly silly? Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2019-08-19 22:52 +0100
Re: Is MIX utterly silly? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2019-08-19 21:14 -0500
Re: Is MIX utterly silly? Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2019-08-20 13:15 +0100
Re: Is MIX utterly silly? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-08-20 14:49 +0200
Re: Is MIX utterly silly? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2019-08-21 07:35 +0200
Re: Is MIX utterly silly? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-08-21 14:08 +0200
Re: Is MIX utterly silly? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2019-08-21 17:10 +0200
Re: Is MIX utterly silly? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-08-22 15:11 +0200
Re: Is MIX utterly silly? Louis Valence <lvalence@example.com> - 2019-08-23 17:13 -0300
Re: Is MIX utterly silly? Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2019-08-24 20:53 +0100
Re: Is MIX utterly silly? luser droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2019-09-08 12:50 -0700
Re: Is MIX utterly silly? Louis Valence <lvalence@example.com> - 2019-08-23 17:01 -0300
csiph-web