Re: Any good practical means against universal surveillance?

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!news.informatik.hu-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	Axel Vogt <&noreply@axelvogt.de>
Newsgroups	comp.programming, sci.stat.math, sci.math.symbolic, sci.crypt.random-numbers
Subject	Re: Any good practical means against universal surveillance?
Date	Mon, 05 Aug 2013 22:24:03 +0200
Lines	11
Message-ID	<b6afubFjjsqU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<ktor4t$km9$2@news.albasani.net>
Reply-To	&noreply@axelvogt.de
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	individual.net 5zZiC/5A0iOIvH3poaEotwqHQO6BF0iXFUKet2n11zJ8Dr/Y0=
Cancel-Lock	sha1:WPKVuRsH7CSh0I1K2tUZNMVN4LU=
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
In-Reply-To	<ktor4t$km9$2@news.albasani.net>
Xref	csiph.com comp.programming:3650

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

On 05.08.2013 20:33, Mok-Kong Shen wrote:
> 
...

Perhaps you first should learn to use a proper email adress
and then should be aware, that it is almost trivial to get
your identity (just as mine), using usenet.

Privacy is my concern as well, but not in those groups and
in the usenet (sorry - and do not want to insult you).

Thread

Any good practical means against universal surveillance? Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-08-05 20:33 +0200
  Re: Any good practical means against universal surveillance? Axel Vogt <&noreply@axelvogt.de> - 2013-08-05 22:24 +0200
    Re: Any good practical means against universal surveillance? Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-08-06 13:56 +0200
  Re: Any good practical means against universal surveillance? Anonymous <anonymous@foto.nl1.torservers.net> - 2013-09-06 20:20 -0400

csiph-web