Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming > #1119

Re: n bits on of m bits

From "The Last Danish Pastry" <clivet@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.theory, comp.programming, sci.math
Subject Re: n bits on of m bits
Date 2011-12-19 21:52 +0000
Message-ID <9l9q13F2g7U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <4344a25e-7fd5-43c5-b43a-a004c9f5f2ad@y7g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


"Andrew Tomazos" <andrew@tomazos.com> wrote...

>I want to loop over every number from 0 to (2^m-1) inclusive whos
> binary representation contains exactly n bits.
>
> ie
>
> for (int i = 0; i < (1<<m); i++)
> {
>    int bits = 0;
>    for (int j = 0; j < m; j++)
>        if (i & (1 << j))
>            bits++;
>    if (bits == n)
>        do_something_with(i);
> }
>
> Clearly this is terribly inefficient.  I'm sure there is a much faster
> way (perhaps by enumerating with mod/div somehow each continous
> sequence of 1s and continuous sequence of 0'x) but I can't seem to see
> it.
>
> Can anyone see it?  Or post a link?  I'm sure this is a fairly common
> one.

Here is the C# code that I use to count the number of 1 bits in a 
non-negative long:

  public static int CountBinaryOnes(long x)
  {
    int result = 0;

    while (x > 0)
    {
      ++result;
      x &= x-1;
    }
    return result;
  } // CountBinaryOnes

-- 
Clive Tooth 

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

n bits on of m bits Andrew Tomazos <andrew@tomazos.com> - 2011-12-17 08:05 -0800
  Re: n bits on of m bits Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-17 10:44 -0600
  Re: n bits on of m bits Dave <dave_and_darla@Juno.com> - 2011-12-17 08:56 -0800
  Re: n bits on of m bits richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) - 2011-12-17 17:22 +0000
  Re: n bits on of m bits "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-12-17 18:23 +0000
    Re: n bits on of m bits Andrew Tomazos <andrew@tomazos.com> - 2011-12-17 11:05 -0800
  Re: n bits on of m bits Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-17 13:24 -0600
    Re: n bits on of m bits Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-17 13:47 -0600
  Re: n bits on of m bits blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2011-12-17 11:28 -0800
  Re: n bits on of m bits "The Last Danish Pastry" <clivet@gmail.com> - 2011-12-19 21:52 +0000
    Re: n bits on of m bits kym@kymhorsell.com - 2011-12-19 22:44 +0000
      Re: n bits on of m bits Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2011-12-19 15:33 -0800
        Re: n bits on of m bits kym@kymhorsell.com - 2011-12-20 03:51 +0000
        Re: n bits on of m bits Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2011-12-20 10:05 +0000
          Re: n bits on of m bits Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-12-20 07:16 -0800
            Re: n bits on of m bits Dave <dave_and_darla@Juno.com> - 2011-12-20 07:29 -0800
              Re: n bits on of m bits Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2011-12-20 16:00 +0000
      Re: n bits on of m bits The Last Danish Pastry <clivet@gmail.com> - 2011-12-19 16:41 -0800
        Re: n bits on of m bits kym@kymhorsell.com - 2011-12-20 04:29 +0000
  Re: n bits on of m bits kym@kymhorsell.com - 2011-12-20 19:04 +0000
  Re: n bits on of m bits Robin Vowels <robin.vowels@gmail.com> - 2011-12-22 07:25 -0800
    Re: n bits on of m bits Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2011-12-22 15:58 +0000
      Re: n bits on of m bits Robin Vowels <robin.vowels@gmail.com> - 2011-12-22 16:26 -0800
        Re: n bits on of m bits Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2011-12-23 18:58 +0000
          Re: n bits on of m bits Robin Vowels <robin.vowels@gmail.com> - 2011-12-25 04:01 -0800
            Re: n bits on of m bits Dave <dave_and_darla@Juno.com> - 2011-12-25 09:22 -0800
  Re: n bits on of m bits Dr J R Stockton <reply1151@merlyn.demon.co.uk> - 2011-12-24 23:36 +0000
  Re: n bits on of m bits "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-12-31 16:32 +0100

csiph-web