Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #534
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!newsfeed.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: fortran 77 errors |
| Date | 24 Jun 2011 20:08:12 GMT |
| Organization | None |
| Lines | 60 |
| Message-ID | <96k95cF6crU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <4e025412$0$1945$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net> <upn607pod3lim761db8b7e9p614j97htl1@4ax.com> <96hbkqF7dvU2@mid.individual.net> <0.35e0cd98d1ba5131b62a.20110623223910BST.8739j09qip.fsf@bsb.me.uk> |
| X-Trace | individual.net C9+z38dGCxo/Z9I5EyAaNw1czLYUsdOCQtsCvM+WqTPadHnAq1 |
| X-Orig-Path | not-for-mail |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:ZUeeiIq2CckUT1qLTiolA89VSuo= |
| X-Newsreader | trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001) |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.programming:534 |
Show key headers only | View raw
In article <0.35e0cd98d1ba5131b62a.20110623223910BST.8739j09qip.fsf@bsb.me.uk>, Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> wrote: > blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> writes: > <snip> > > For what it's worth, Fortran 77 supports both statement labels > > *and* line numbers -- the latter being positioned after column 72 > > and ignored by the compiler. Line numbers were useful back in > > the punched-card days; diligently numbering all the lines of one's > > program meant that if one dropped the card deck containing the source > > code, one could put the cards back in order using a card-sorting > > machine on the columns (73-80) containing the line numbers. > > These columns were not restricted to "line numbers". For one thing, it > was common for them not to be sequential so that cards could be added > without renumbering everything, Quite -- that's what I meant, though admittedly not what I said! (Choosing a good increment between successive whatever-you-call-'ems was sometimes tricky, too.) > and the field often contained something > to identify the program. That way, if you dropped a box with more than > one program in it, you could get it back into order in less than a day > and a half. Oh right -- I had forgotten that indeed it was typical for the "line numbers" to also include alphabetic text identifying the program. A quick Google search seems to confirm my recollection that these things (text plus number) are called "sequence numbers". I'm remembering too that some keypunches had features that would to some extent automate producing sequence numbers. I could be wrong about that. > My speciality was to forget to flip the metal card catcher back after > removing a deck from the output hopper. The next deck that went though > would then spray up into the room like geek confetti. It was always an > un-sequenced deck. > > > Ah, the not-always-good old days! And you left my comment in for good reason. :-) By the time I started writing nontrivial programs (as opposed to short homeworks and such), I had access to electronic editors [*], so I don't have good war stories about cards. But I can imagine. I did have a summer job at which my tasks involved a bit of keypunching and the occasional use of a card sorter. Those were the days? [*] Starting with the line editor available under MVS/TSO. By today's standards it was unbelievably primitive, but compared to cards, *WHAT* an improvement .... "Thanks for the memories"? -- B. L. Massingill ObDisclaimer: I don't speak for my employers; they return the favor.
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
fortran 77 errors "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-06-22 16:43 -0400
Re: fortran 77 errors James Waldby <not@valid.invalid> - 2011-06-22 21:18 +0000
Re: fortran 77 errors "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-06-22 18:31 -0400
Re: fortran 77 errors Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-06-22 17:21 -0700
Re: fortran 77 errors "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-06-22 20:50 -0400
Re: fortran 77 errors Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-23 14:58 +1200
Re: fortran 77 errors "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-06-23 00:27 -0400
Re: fortran 77 errors blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-06-23 17:07 +0000
Re: fortran 77 errors "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-06-23 16:53 -0400
Re: fortran 77 errors Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-06-23 14:05 -0700
Re: fortran 77 errors "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-06-24 17:58 -0400
Re: fortran 77 errors "robin" <robin51@dodo.mapson.com.au> - 2011-06-27 17:04 +1000
Re: fortran 77 errors Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-06-23 12:34 -0700
Re: fortran 77 errors blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-06-23 17:06 +0000
Re: fortran 77 errors "robin" <robin51@dodo.mapson.com.au> - 2011-06-27 17:01 +1000
Re: fortran 77 errors Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-06-28 06:39 -0700
Re: fortran 77 errors free@securityaudit.val.newsbank.net (Dick Wesseling) - 2011-06-23 00:43 +0000
Re: fortran 77 errors "Ant" <not@home.today> - 2011-06-23 02:38 +0100
Re: fortran 77 errors "robin" <robin51@dodo.mapson.com.au> - 2011-06-27 17:07 +1000
Re: fortran 77 errors Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-23 00:47 -0700
Re: fortran 77 errors Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-23 00:55 -0700
Re: fortran 77 errors "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-06-23 04:16 -0400
Re: fortran 77 errors Ike Naar <ike@sverige.freeshell.org> - 2011-06-23 09:23 +0000
Re: fortran 77 errors Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-06-23 06:55 -0700
Re: fortran 77 errors Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-06-23 07:02 -0700
Re: fortran 77 errors Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-06-23 15:22 +0100
Re: fortran 77 errors Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-06-23 08:19 -0700
Re: fortran 77 errors Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-23 08:52 -0700
Re: fortran 77 errors blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-06-23 17:32 +0000
Re: fortran 77 errors Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-06-23 22:39 +0100
Re: fortran 77 errors blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-06-24 20:08 +0000
Re: fortran 77 errors Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-06-23 19:38 +0100
Re: fortran 77 errors "osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2011-06-23 10:25 -0500
Re: fortran 77 errors Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-06-23 09:47 -0700
Re: fortran 77 errors blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-06-23 17:30 +0000
Re: fortran 77 errors "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-06-23 17:30 -0400
Re: fortran 77 errors Dan <dantex1@aol.com> - 2011-06-25 10:10 -0700
Re: fortran 77 errors "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-06-28 11:21 -0400
Re: fortran 77 errors Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-06-28 09:40 -0700
Re: fortran 77 errors "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-06-28 17:59 -0400
Re: fortran 77 errors Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-06-28 15:21 -0700
Re: fortran 77 errors "robin" <robin51@dodo.mapson.com.au> - 2011-06-28 00:43 +1000
Re: fortran 77 errors Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-06-28 11:40 +0100
Re: fortran 77 errors "robin" <robin51@dodo.com.au> - 2011-07-05 09:06 +1000
Re: fortran 77 errors "robin" <robin51@dodo.mapson.com.au> - 2011-06-28 00:41 +1000
Re: fortran 77 errors Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-06-23 12:12 +0100
Re: fortran 77 errors Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-23 06:52 -0700
Re: fortran 77 errors "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-06-23 17:45 -0400
Re: fortran 77 errors Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-06-23 15:30 -0700
Re: fortran 77 errors Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-23 17:25 -0700
Re: fortran 77 errors Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-06-24 10:35 -0700
Re: fortran 77 errors blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-06-24 20:09 +0000
Re: fortran 77 errors Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-06-24 01:38 +0100
Re: fortran 77 errors "robin" <robin51@dodo.mapson.com.au> - 2011-06-27 17:10 +1000
Re: fortran 77 errors kym@kymhorsell.com - 2011-06-23 21:23 +0000
Re: fortran 77 errors "robin" <robin51@dodo.mapson.com.au> - 2011-06-27 17:13 +1000
csiph-web