Read again, i correct about Delphi and Freepascal and volatile and safety..

Newsgroups	comp.programming
Date	2020-07-11 16:18 -0700
Message-ID	<905b5bd9-b3da-4b4e-a290-d014e9a300bfo@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Read again, i correct about Delphi and Freepascal and volatile and safety..
From	aminer68@gmail.com

Show all headers | View raw

Hello,


Read again, i correct about Delphi and Freepascal and volatile and safety..

So as you are noticing from my below thoughts that on Delphi for windows 
and Freepascal non-local memory is always considered volatile, and i think this is good for safety in parallel programming, since C++ and Rust don't  provide this configuration that makes non-local memory always volatile to be this safety, so i think that C++ and Rust are dangerous.

Read my following thoughts to notice more:

About Delphi and Volatile..

Volatile has been introduced first in the Delphi for Mobile Development and after that the Delphi Berlin 10.1 for desktop has added Volatile for compatibility with Delphi for Mobile Development, but i think the Delphi windows versions that are not LLVM-based Delphi Compilers will still be
compatible with older versions of Delphi for windows, so i think my parallel software projects for Delphi for windows are working correctly.

Read the following to notice:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/232075/does-delphi-have-any-equivalent-to-cs-volatile-variable

Also read my following thoughts about Volatile and Freepascal and Delphi to understand more:

https://community.idera.com/developer-tools/programming-languages/f/delphi-language/71190/more-about-c-and-object-pascal-languages


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Read again, i correct about Delphi and Freepascal and volatile and safety.. aminer68@gmail.com - 2020-07-11 16:18 -0700

csiph-web