Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming > #955

Re: Roslyn compilers

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.chainon-marquant.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!news.glorb.com!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu>
Newsgroups comp.programming
Subject Re: Roslyn compilers
Date Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:29:05 -0700
Lines 11
Message-ID <87k47tdoha.fsf@blp.benpfaff.org> (permalink)
References <3d557d28-324e-41a6-b135-b4d5860fcf08@u10g2000prl.googlegroups.com>
Reply-To Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace usenet.stanford.edu 1319560202 17684 127.0.0.1 (25 Oct 2011 16:30:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To action@cs.stanford.edu
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock sha1:byIWU7//plGWzuLnw4IjRm+B+9c=
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.programming:955

Show key headers only | View raw

Notinheritable <long3131@gmail.com> writes:

> why rewrite both c# and vb compilers. Without starting some kind of
> language debate, why can't Microsoft rewrite only one of the
> compilers? Why the duplicated effort?

What makes you think that MS can't rewrite just one of their
compilers?
-- 
Ben Pfaff 
http://benpfaff.org

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Roslyn compilers Notinheritable <long3131@gmail.com> - 2011-10-25 07:55 -0700
  Re: Roslyn compilers Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2011-10-25 09:29 -0700
  Re: Roslyn compilers Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-10-25 11:50 -0500
    Re: Roslyn compilers Notinheritable <long3131@gmail.com> - 2011-10-26 08:14 -0700
      Re: Roslyn compilers Joe Wright <joewwright@comcast.net> - 2011-10-26 15:15 -0400
      Re: Roslyn compilers Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-10-26 15:58 -0500

csiph-web