Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #7087
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube |
| Date | Thu, 08 Dec 2016 02:56:15 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 15 |
| Message-ID | <87inqvcenk.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink) |
| References | <o25gc3$jsk$1@news.mixmin.net> <o25gnf$bh8$2@dont-email.me> <87ede84c-c196-4e44-956f-7e1729be4963@googlegroups.com> <o26k08$ogb$3@dont-email.me> <clmf4c9ubp13qcf458a660np21p1vjfhgt@4ax.com> <o28vdk$9pl$1@dont-email.me> <e2ah4c50lqcjnruum6mb7ehsim6po2t004@4ax.com> <20161207172958.735@kylheku.com> <o2agt4$d9i$3@dont-email.me> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="dcbcf2bbf9d49280f8863de003463fff"; logging-data="6605"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ZuSDUPKqE0TPwIbp702B5izgk6s66vA4=" |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:XcTRIATtfQW9taloJA8Le7OTCmY= sha1:AubHLyNxCpcpwbnDGPODqi18r9M= |
| X-BSB-Auth | 1.702d8465499cfec711db.20161208025615GMT.87inqvcenk.fsf@bsb.me.uk |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.programming:7087 |
Show key headers only | View raw
"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> writes: > Could one use a single, unified mathematics equation to describe this > algorithm? Yes. There is a theorem in computability theory (the MRDP theorem) that equates Turing machines and Diophantine equations. But this is a formal equivalence between computing something and solving a specific kind of equation and may not be what you were asking about. <snip> (BTW, interleaved and bottom posting is usually preferred to top posting.) -- Ben.
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 23:04 +0800
Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 03:47 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 20:32 +0800
Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 18:24 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube Kaz Kylheku <221-501-9011@kylheku.com> - 2016-12-08 01:36 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-12-08 10:36 +0800
Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-12-08 02:56 +0000
Re: [OT] Posting algorithm "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-12-08 12:31 +0800
Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-12-08 10:37 +0800
Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube marston shores <kp@of.fire> - 2016-12-07 09:47 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 07:01 -0800
Re: [OT] A: Rubik Cube equation? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-12-08 10:45 +0800
Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-12-08 10:58 +0100
Re: [OT] Re: Understanding mathematics through learning "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-12-08 21:30 +0800
csiph-web