Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #6001
| From | Mark Carroll <mtbc@bcs.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: unicode is a fail |
| Date | 2015-12-02 16:32 +0000 |
| Organization | none |
| Message-ID | <87h9k0stf1.fsf@ixod.org> (permalink) |
| References | <4466b45b-1a0a-4b55-8d60-c8bee032b294@googlegroups.com> <87vb8i83oq.fsf@ixod.org> <6a401998-fed6-4dd9-ac7f-4778e47cf8ff@googlegroups.com> |
On 02 Dec 2015, fir wrote: (snip) > i think general convention of using utf-32 everywhere could repair this mess > maybe though 1) some maybe can see this crazy as utf-32 is probably now least > used 2) im not sure (if utf-32 is as simple as it should i mean one letter is > one 32-bit int in memory and no other things do occur) If one's typically working with text that ISO-8859 could handle, UTF-32 is a fairly wasteful way of storing such text. -- Mark
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
unicode is a fail fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 08:34 -0800
Re: unicode is a fail Mark Carroll <mtbc@bcs.org> - 2015-12-01 17:43 +0000
Re: unicode is a fail fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 08:00 -0800
Re: unicode is a fail Mark Carroll <mtbc@bcs.org> - 2015-12-02 16:32 +0000
Re: unicode is a fail fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 09:53 -0800
csiph-web