Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #8736
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: Question about algorithm numerical domain |
| Date | 2018-04-30 19:38 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87d0ygr14e.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink) |
| References | <8f53ddc2-e18b-4935-a2e5-1be81e1e04e6@googlegroups.com> |
programmernovice <ivandenisovich826@gmail.com> writes: > Hi everyone. My book (Smith's "An Introduction to Goedel's Theorems") > defines the numerical domain of an algorithm as the set of naturals > that, when input individually to the algorithm, result in its > "working", that is to terminate and output some result. In the book it > is also stated that any wff of a programming language (e. g. C++) can > be considered an algorithm, having a numerical domain. > > I'm not clear about how an instruction such as "Go To" can be > considered an algorithm, or if it is, then how does one determine its > numerical domain. Quite. But then it almost certainly does not come under the definition of "WFF of a programming language". A goto hidden in a function, f, is OK because we can consider f(x) to be WFF with a numerical domain. -- Ben.
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Question about algorithm numerical domain programmernovice <ivandenisovich826@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 11:09 -0700
Re: Question about algorithm numerical domain Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2018-04-30 19:38 +0100
Re: Question about algorithm numerical domain programmernovice <ivandenisovich826@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 08:58 -0700
csiph-web