Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #8010
| From | Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.algebra.help, comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: on notation, MM', graph theory, incidence matrix product |
| Date | 2017-09-17 07:51 -0300 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <86mv5t7g4p.fsf@toledo.com> (permalink) |
| References | <86k20y90su.fsf@toledo.com> <87h8w28xgn.fsf@bsb.me.uk> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> writes: > Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> writes: > >> Problem. Show that if G is simple, the entries on the diagonals of both >> MM' and A^2 are the degrees of the vertices of G. >> >> I don't understand what is meant by MM'. M is the incidence matrix of >> graph G. By looking at section 1.4, subgraphs, I take that M' must be >> the incidence matrix of some subgraph induced by M, > > No. The notation is confusing but ' is often used for different things > in different places. > >> but M is a matrix, >> so I'm puzzled. AFAIK, I need a set of vertices of a set of edges to >> induce a subgraph. > > You are right. M is a matrix and the ' just means normal matrix > transposition. M is (in general) a rectangular v x e matrix so it can > only be multiplied by an e x v matrix such as the transpose. The > incidence matrix of any subgraph would not be the right size. In effect > you have to deduce the meaning from the only thing that could make > sense. I did happen to consider ' as matrix transposition, but then I (incorrectly) found a counterexample to the claim so I thought I was totally off. The counterexample I found was for a nonsimple graph. >> I appreciate a clarification on the book's notation. Thank you! > > The summary of synbols at the end gives R' as the transpose of R. It's > a shame it was used with that meaning right after some text that used V' > and E' simply as a modifier to mean some subset of V or E. Yes! :-) Thanks very much!
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
on notation, MM', graph theory, incidence matrix product Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> - 2017-09-16 11:26 -0300
Re: on notation, MM', graph theory, incidence matrix product Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-16 16:39 +0100
Re: on notation, MM', graph theory, incidence matrix product Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> - 2017-09-17 07:51 -0300
csiph-web