Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming > #13510

More of my philosophy about emergence and creative and innovative intelligence..

Show all headers | View raw

Hello,


More of my philosophy about emergence and creative and innovative intelligence..

I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

Here is what i wrote previously about emergence:

Emergence is the formation of global patterns from solely local interactions.

I invite you to read more about the strong and weak emergence here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergence

I think i am smart, and i say that when you acquire more
deeper and more general knowledge and experience than average, that means you are not too specialized, it is an efficient layer that
gives rise to an emergence that we call the "intelligence" that is much more creative and innovative, and it is also like what is doing the company that we call Intel by hiring and rehiring the types of architects and veterans so that to be successful, read about it below, and it is like what i am explaining in my following interesting new proverb, read it carefully in my following thoughts:

More of philosophy about one of my proverbs about intellectual openness
and more..

And here is my new proverb:

"Human vitality comes from intellectual openness and intellectual
openness also comes from divergent thinking and you have to well balance
divergent thinking with convergent thinking so that to converge towards
the global optimum of efficiency and not get stuck on a local optimum of
efficiency, and this kind of well balancing makes the good creativity."

And i will explain more my proverb so that you understand it:

I think that divergent thinking is thought process or method used to
generate creative ideas by exploring many possible solutions, but notice
that we even need openness in a form of economic actors that share ideas
across nations and industries (and this needs globalization) that make
us much more creative and that's good for economy, since you can easily
notice that globalization also brings a kind of optimality to divergent
thinking, and also you have to know how to balance divergent thinking
with convergent thinking, since if divergent thinking is much greater
than convergent thinking it can become costly in terms of time, and if
the convergent thinking is much greater than divergent thinking you can
get stuck on local optimum of efficiency and not converge to a global
optimum of efficiency, and it is related to my following thoughts about
the philosopher and economist Adam Smith, so i invite you to read them:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ftf3lx5Rzxo

More precision about more of my philosophy about USA and division of Labor and about specialization..

I have just spoken about the super Soldiers that are the big brains of
USA etc. read below about it, but now there is another very important
thing that makes USA a winner, and it is the following and the company called Intel in USA is using it, read my following thoughts about it:

I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that the main problem of our modern world, it is the problem of the division of Labor that is the separation of tasks in any economic system, but this kind of specialization of the people from the point of view of philosophy is too much specialization of individuals that make them lack much knowledge and lack much wisdom, so this too much specialization from the point of view of philosophy has its weakness in our modern world, but notice that when you become much older and you are not too specialized and you accumulate much more deeper and much more general experience and knowledge and you become an architect or Chief Technology Officer or such, it is also excellent, you can for example notice it by reading the following about Intel that is hiring and rehiring those types of architects and veterans so that to be successful:

Shlomit Weiss returns to Intel as Head of Chip Development

Read more here:

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.developpez.com%2Factu%2F316610%2FShlomit-Weiss-revient-chez-Intel-au-poste-de-responsable-du-developpement-des-puces-un-nom-de-plus-dans-la-liste-des-veterans-qu-Intel-continue-de-reembaucher%2F

More of philosophy about USA and Silicon Valley as a cluster of venture capitalists..

I have just spoken about the super Soldiers of USA that are the Big Brains of USA such as the ones in Silicon Valley, read below about it, but having those Big Brains of Silicon Valley is not sufficient since you have to know that USA is much more efficient by being the Silicon Valley as a cluster of venture capitalists etc.., but so that to know more, read carefully the following so that to understand:

I invite you to read the following article that shows
that USA is much better than Europe for start-ups:

Europe’s start-up ecosystem: Heating up, but still facing challenges

https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/technology-media-and-telecommunications/our-insights/europes-start-up-ecosystem-heating-up-but-still-facing-challenges

And it is related to the following interesting articles:

Silicon Valley: a cluster of venture capitalists?

http://parisinnovationreview.com/articles-en/silicon-valley-a-cluster-of-venture-capitalists

Capitalism switches from linear to exponential growth

http://parisinnovationreview.com/articles-en/capitalism-switches-from-linear-to-exponential-growth

More of my philosophy about what is truly USA..

I think that if you want to know what is truly USA, you have to look carefully at the big brains of USA, so notice carefully in the following video how the Big Brains of Silicon Valley that are like super soldiers are bringing the best to USA, and i think that this bringing the best of those super Soldiers is what is shaping the most USA:

Cybertopia: How Silicon Valley Plans to Revolutionize the Society | ENDEVR Documentary

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYxdRlJK2ig

And read carefully in my following writing about the super Soldiers that are the big brains of USA:

 Let's look for example at USA, so read the following from Jonathan Wai that is a Ph.D., it says:

"Heiner Rindermann and James Thompson uncovered that the “smart fraction” of a country is quite influential in impacting the performance of that country, for example, its GDP."

And it also says the following:

"“According to recent population estimates, there are about eight Chinese and Indians for every American in the top 1 percent in brains.” But consider that the U.S. benefits from the smart fractions of every other country in the world because it continues to serve as a magnet for brainpower, something that is not even factored into these rankings.

What these rankings clearly show is America is likely still in the lead in terms of brainpower. And this is despite the fact federal funding for educating our smart fraction is currently zero. Everyone seems worried Americans are falling behind, but this is because everyone is focusing on average and below average people. Maybe it’s time we started taking a closer look at the smartest people of our own country."

Read more here:

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/finding-the-next-einstein/201312/whats-the-smartest-country-in-the-world

So as you are noticing it's immigrants(and there are about eight Chinese and Indians for every American in the top 1 percent in brains) that are making USA a rich country.

And read also the following to understand more:

Why Silicon Valley Wouldn’t Work Without Immigrants

There are many theories for why immigrants find so much success in tech. Many American-born tech workers point out that there is no shortage of American-born employees to fill the roles at many tech companies. Researchers have found that more than enough students graduate from American colleges to fill available tech jobs. Critics of the industry’s friendliness toward immigrants say it comes down to money — that technology companies take advantage of visa programs, like the H-1B system, to get foreign workers at lower prices than they would pay American-born ones.

But if that criticism rings true in some parts of the tech industry, it misses the picture among Silicon Valley’s top companies. One common misperception of Silicon Valley is that it operates like a factory; in that view, tech companies can hire just about anyone from anywhere in the world to fill a particular role.

But today’s most ambitious tech companies are not like factories. They’re more like athletic teams. They’re looking for the LeBrons and Bradys — the best people in the world to come up with some brand-new, never-before-seen widget, to completely reimagine what widgets should do in the first place.

“It’s not about adding tens or hundreds of thousands of people into manufacturing plants,” said Aaron Levie, the co-founder and chief executive of the cloud-storage company Box. “It’s about the couple ideas that are going to be invented that are going to change everything.”

Why do tech honchos believe that immigrants are better at coming up with those inventions? It’s partly a numbers thing. As the tech venture capitalist Paul Graham has pointed out, the United States has only 5 percent of the world’s population; it stands to reason that most of the world’s best new ideas will be thought up by people who weren’t born here.

If you look at some of the most consequential ideas in tech, you find an unusual number that were developed by immigrants. For instance, Google’s entire advertising business — that is, the basis for the vast majority of its revenues and profits, the engine that allows it to hire thousands of people in the United States — was created by three immigrants: Salar Kamangar and Omid Kordestani, who came to the United States from Iran, and Eric Veach, from Canada.

But it’s not just a numbers thing. Another reason immigrants do so well in tech is that people from outside bring new perspectives that lead to new ideas.

Read more here:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/08/technology/personaltech/why-silicon-valley-wouldnt-work-without-immigrants.html

More of my philosophy about the well balancing in philosophy..

I think i am a smart philosopher, and i think that this kind of well balancing in Utilitarianism that i have just spoken about below,
is a central very important idea in my new philosophy, since as you will
read in my new philosophy below that it shows that you have to know how to well balance between individualism and collectivism and between cooperation or collaboration and competition, and you have to know
how to well balance between happiness and well-being of the present or today and that of the tomorrow or the future, but so that to be this well balancing you have to know more about my new philosophy since I think that my philosophy is more smart, since in my philosophy i am also explaining that the day permits to understand the night and human life is like the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty, since human life is difficulties and suffering that also permit us to appreciate much more human life or that permits us to appreciate much more our kind of civilization and i say in my philosophy that it also gives more intensity to pleasures of life, so my philosophy doesn't look like the other philosophies, so i invite you to holistically understand my philosophy by carefully reading it here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI

And you can read more about my philosophy in my following thoughts:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vlDWhmf-MIM

And  you have to understand more my new philosophy
about morality, since i am proving and showing that morality is
both universal and progressive, since you have to look at it
like mathematics, since you can look at the derivative from two point of views, since the derivative can be an instantaneous rate of change at a particular instant or point, but there is also the average derivative in an interval, so by logical analogy, morality can
be understood in my philosophy as instantaneous rate of change
at a particular instant or point that permits to see that morality
is the act of correcting the defects at a particular instant or point
in time, or it can be seen much clearer as the laws and acts of correcting the defects in an interval of time so that you can
clearly understand that morality is the act of perfecting at best
towards the goal of being greatly perfect or perfect, and this
permits to understand that Democracy is not exactness of morality
but it needs to be exactness of morality. Read all my above
thoughts about my philosophy etc.

And you can take a look at my photo that i have just put
here in my website(I am 53 years old):

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/jackson-network-problem

And read my following thoughts of my philosophy about what is smartness:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Wzf6AOl41xs

And read my following thoughts of my philosophy about artificial intelligence:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/63xQiI2GbsU

And read my following thoughts of my philosophy about my new proverbs
and about dignity:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/72FdpcFe9Vk

You can read more about my education and my way of doing here:

Here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k

And i have just written many poems of Love in english and french, you can read them here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/IBKxNSPGOMw

Why the definition of Utilitarianism is like an IQ test..

Notice that i am smart, since when i just looked rapidly at the
definition below of Utilitarianism, i have rapidly discovered a pattern
with my fluid intelligence and it is that even if the definition
of Utilitarianism is: That Utilitarianism prescribes actions that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
i can easily see a pattern with my fluid intelligence since i am
smart, since the pattern is that Utilitarianism maximises happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future, i mean that responability
is inherent to the definition since the well balancing forces us
to be responsability in the present or today so that to maximize correctly happiness and well being tomorrow or in the future.

I can give you another IQ test that i have rapidly invented and
here it is:

So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid
intelligence that permits to understand, here it is:

So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country
called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ?

It is like my IQ test..

So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go
fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need
the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be
"reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has
too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take
into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so
you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan.

Read my previous thoughts:

More precision of my philosophy about Utilitarianism..

I invite you to read the following definition of what is Utilitarianism:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism

So as you are noticing, it says that Utilitarianism prescribes actions that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
but i think that Utilitarianism is not idiotic since it maximises happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future.


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

More of my philosophy about emergence and creative and innovative intelligence.. Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com> - 2021-08-23 09:14 -0700

csiph-web