Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #3736
| Date | 2013-09-14 23:50 -0500 |
|---|---|
| From | Robert Miles <milesrf@Usenet-News.net> |
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: Globals/"static" access in OO languages. (Was: Singleton quintessence) |
| References | <179c6d53-7d84-438d-8047-b7fd8038a2cf@googlegroups.com> <l0kvqd$gqn$1@speranza.aioe.org> <iGrXt.29592$PB4.5568@fx03.iad> <rI1Zt.83896$5r1.40610@en-nntp-14.dc1.easynews.com> <lY1Zt.36438$Dw7.6438@fx31.iad> |
| Message-ID | <52353ca9$0$44511$862e30e2@ngroups.net> (permalink) |
On 9/14/2013 1:31 PM, Daniel Pitts wrote: > On 9/14/13 11:14 AM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 9/9/13 6:09 PM, Daniel Pitts wrote: [snip] > Hmm, I could see the entry point of the program accepting a "System" > object, which provides access to those resources. > > At the same time, I'm not really sure those are the same concept as > static. Perhaps behind the scenes they are. So system calls may need > to access "static" data, but the application itself wouldn't directly > access static/global data. > At least in C, "static" means that the value(s) of the object never change as the program runs; this is used mainly to tell the compiler that it can use optimizations that depend on these values never changing. Of course, if you don't care how fast your program runs or how much memory it uses, you don't need to bother with optimizations.
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Singleton quintessence bob <bob@coolfone.net> - 2013-09-07 18:36 -0700
Re: Singleton quintessence Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-07 18:49 -0700
Re: Singleton quintessence Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2013-09-07 22:12 -0700
Re: Singleton quintessence Ney André de Mello Zunino <zunino@softplan.com.br> - 2013-09-09 14:17 -0300
Globals/"static" access in OO languages. (Was: Singleton quintessence) Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2013-09-09 15:09 -0700
Re: Globals/"static" access in OO languages. (Was: Singleton quintessence) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2013-09-14 14:14 -0400
Re: Globals/"static" access in OO languages. (Was: Singleton quintessence) Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2013-09-14 11:31 -0700
Re: Globals/"static" access in OO languages. (Was: Singleton quintessence) Robert Miles <milesrf@Usenet-News.net> - 2013-09-14 23:50 -0500
Re: Globals/"static" access in OO languages. (Was: Singleton quintessence) Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2013-09-15 17:18 +1200
Re: Singleton quintessence "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2013-09-10 17:34 -0500
Re: Singleton quintessence Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2013-09-14 11:34 -0700
csiph-web