Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming > #3736

Re: Globals/"static" access in OO languages. (Was: Singleton quintessence)

Date 2013-09-14 23:50 -0500
From Robert Miles <milesrf@Usenet-News.net>
Newsgroups comp.programming
Subject Re: Globals/"static" access in OO languages. (Was: Singleton quintessence)
References <179c6d53-7d84-438d-8047-b7fd8038a2cf@googlegroups.com> <l0kvqd$gqn$1@speranza.aioe.org> <iGrXt.29592$PB4.5568@fx03.iad> <rI1Zt.83896$5r1.40610@en-nntp-14.dc1.easynews.com> <lY1Zt.36438$Dw7.6438@fx31.iad>
Message-ID <52353ca9$0$44511$862e30e2@ngroups.net> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 9/14/2013 1:31 PM, Daniel Pitts wrote:
> On 9/14/13 11:14 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 9/9/13 6:09 PM, Daniel Pitts wrote:
[snip]
> Hmm, I could see the entry point of the program accepting a "System" 
> object, which provides access to those resources.
>
> At the same time, I'm not really sure those are the same concept as 
> static.  Perhaps behind the scenes they are. So system calls may need 
> to access "static" data, but the application itself wouldn't directly 
> access static/global data.
>
At least in C, "static" means that the value(s) of the object never 
change as the program runs; this is used mainly to tell the compiler 
that it can use optimizations that depend on these values never changing.

Of course, if you don't care how fast your program runs or how much 
memory it uses, you don't need to bother with optimizations.

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Singleton quintessence bob <bob@coolfone.net> - 2013-09-07 18:36 -0700
  Re: Singleton quintessence Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-07 18:49 -0700
    Re: Singleton quintessence Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2013-09-07 22:12 -0700
  Re: Singleton quintessence Ney André de Mello Zunino <zunino@softplan.com.br> - 2013-09-09 14:17 -0300
    Globals/"static" access in OO languages. (Was: Singleton quintessence) Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2013-09-09 15:09 -0700
      Re: Globals/"static" access in OO languages. (Was: Singleton quintessence) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2013-09-14 14:14 -0400
        Re: Globals/"static" access in OO languages. (Was: Singleton quintessence) Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2013-09-14 11:31 -0700
          Re: Globals/"static" access in OO languages. (Was: Singleton quintessence) Robert Miles <milesrf@Usenet-News.net> - 2013-09-14 23:50 -0500
            Re: Globals/"static" access in OO languages. (Was: Singleton quintessence) Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2013-09-15 17:18 +1200
  Re: Singleton quintessence "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2013-09-10 17:34 -0500
  Re: Singleton quintessence Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2013-09-14 11:34 -0700

csiph-web