Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming > #15364

Re: More of my philosophy about usenet...

Path csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Spiros Bousbouras <spibou@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.programming
Subject Re: More of my philosophy about usenet...
Date Wed, 13 Jul 2022 15:24:51 -0000 (UTC)
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 84
Message-ID <2xuV6hnIgumgSprkn@bongo-ra.co> (permalink)
References <74b45216-249c-4909-9839-0f6f68b75404n@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
Injection-Date Wed, 13 Jul 2022 15:24:51 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8b48f97bbb097c912291c22b4de98bd2"; logging-data="2533249"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18hnHZfALFxesCgPiYPU65g"
Cancel-Lock sha1:9bbff+Dr44yT2+VFhqnzWFkjly0=
X-Server-Commands nowebcancel
In-Reply-To <74b45216-249c-4909-9839-0f6f68b75404n@googlegroups.com>
X-Organisation Weyland-Yutani
Xref csiph.com comp.programming:15364

Show key headers only | View raw


On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 15:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> More of my philosophy about usenet...

[...]

> As you have noticed, i have posted on usenet on the newsgroup
> of comp.programming, but it is not that i am a spammer, 

Yes , you are.

> it is just that i have posted here on some subjects since i have wanted
> usenet to not die,

The large volume of off topic posts you make makes it more likely that
people who want to make on topic posts will avoid the relevant groups.
I mean I can imagine people taking a short look on  comp.programming ,
seeing the avalanche of drivel (not just by you) and decide that the
group is effectively dead.

> but if you want me to not post here, i will not post
> here,

Please stop posting off topic stuff here and on  comp.programming.threads .
What you are doing is treating  comp.programming , comp.programming.threads
and possibly other groups as your blog. Creating a usenet based blog is a
perfectly reasonable idea and one I may do myself one day but it's not the
same as taking over a preexisting group for this purpose.

So here is a suggestion for you :

    From: tskirvin@killfile.org (Tim Skirvin)
    Newsgroups: news.admin.hierarchies,news.admin.censorship,alt.config,news.groups,free.control,free.hipcrime,free.answers,alt.answers,news.answers
    Subject: The free.* FAQ (version 2.0.1)
    Followup-To: alt.config,free.control
    Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2022 00:04:02 +0000
    Expires: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 00:04:02 GMT
    Message-ID: <freenet.faq.20220701000402$12ab@news.killfile.org>
{
 3.  Can I make my own group?

        Certainly.  Just post a message that looks something like this
(headers and all):

Newsgroups: free.control,free.fishhead
Subject: cmsg newgroup free.fishhead
Approved: mumy@fishhead.fish    
Control: newgroup free.fishhead
From: roly@poly.com (Fish Head)

For your newsgroups file:
free.fishhead           Eat them up, yum!

        There's no guarantee that anybody will carry your group, of course, 
but at least you tried.  Better names will probably ensure that more servers 
will carry your group, so you might want to put some thought into it.
}
Why don't you use the above method to create  free.blog.ramine ? But you
would have to use a proper newsreader or a programming library to form
an appropriate message and post it , googlegroups won't do it. Since you
claim to be good in programming , it shouldn't be a problem.

> since usenet died in 2010, since we’ve all called Usenet dead many
> times over the last decade, but it wasn’t until May, 2010 that we could
> truly say that the death certificate had been signed and the corpse buried.
> And you can read the following article so that to notice it:

> https://thenextweb.com/news/usenet-officially-dead-buried

Since I read usenet regularly , if it dies , I will notice it myself , I
don't need to read it in some article. The article is from June 2011 and says
"I haven't been to a newsgroup in nearly ten years" .This tells you how
seriously it should be taken. The reasoning provided why usenet is dead is
idiotic. The only good thing in the article is that it gives the link
https://today.duke.edu/2010/05/usenet.html .In that link we read the
following puzzling statement : "Duke decided to retire its aging Usenet
server based on low usage and rising costs." .Why not replace it with a newer
server ? With the advances in computer hardware , running a usenet server
should be getting (way) cheaper rather than more expensive.

-- 
vlaho.ninja/prog

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

More of my philosophy about usenet... Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com> - 2022-06-23 15:56 -0700
  Re: More of my philosophy about usenet... Noel Duffy <uaigh@icloud.com> - 2022-06-24 11:51 +1200
    Re: More of my philosophy about usenet... Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com> - 2022-06-23 17:01 -0700
      Re: More of my philosophy about usenet... Noel Duffy <uaigh@icloud.com> - 2022-06-24 13:06 +1200
  Re: More of my philosophy about usenet... G o d <he1983912@mail.com> - 2022-06-24 10:34 -0700
  Re: More of my philosophy about usenet... Spiros Bousbouras <spibou@gmail.com> - 2022-07-13 15:24 +0000

csiph-web