Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #2563
| Message-ID | <2051112.NKQCjSVfUK@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Date | 2012-12-02 19:06 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: form field/spreadsheet question |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript, comp.programming |
| References | <k9el1a$ml8$1@news.albasani.net> <anvro9-2t8.ln1@luuk.invalid.lan> <kq2nb8545sb31gqhj08kjib99c2ttagf11@4ax.com> |
| Followup-To | comp.lang.javascript |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Followups directed to: comp.lang.javascript
Wally W. wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 13:55:39 +0100, Luuk wrote:
>> On 02-12-2012 05:22, Jon wrote:
>>> Where can I find an editor/..../.... for Javascript?
>>
>> Notepad.exe, or any other text-editor....
>>
>>> Where can I find an ..../compiler/.... for Javascript?
>>
>> There is no compiler for Javascript,
>
> That is an oversight in the IT world.
Strictly speaking, what was stated is correct, because there is no
"Javascript" language to begin with: <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
Loosely speaking it is wrong, though, because ECMAScript source code in Web
browsers and elsewhere is JIT-compiled and _not_ interpreted verbatim. Most
of the script engines of ECMAScript implementations compile source code to
bytecode, executed by a Virtual Machine (this applies to Netscape/Mozilla
JavaScript and Microsoft JScript). Google V8 even JIT-compiles source code
to native machine code, which part of why it is so fast by comparison.
>> because it is an interpreted language.
>
> One does not follow from the other.
And since even the premise is wrong …
> Spreadsheets are also "interpreted."
Spreadsheets are not a programming language.
> That didn't stop someone from
> writing a compiler:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/As_Easy_As
ISTM you are confusing things.
> How many would like a compliable web page that has:
> 1. Embedded javascript
Meaning what exactly?
> 2. A 'save as" capability to write all contents, including entered
> values, to a disk file?
That capability exists already.
> 3. An "open file" capability to resume work on or print values in a
> file placed on disk with the "save as" feature mentioned above?
That too.
> I know I would like such a compiler.
I do not think you know what a compiler is or where you are posting to,
though.
F'up2 cljs
PointedEars
--
realism: HTML 4.01 Strict
evangelism: XHTML 1.0 Strict
madness: XHTML 1.1 as application/xhtml+xml
-- Bjoern Hoehrmann
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
form field/spreadsheet question "Jon" <no-reply@no-reply.com> - 2012-12-01 23:22 -0500
Re: form field/spreadsheet question Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2012-12-02 13:55 +0100
Re: form field/spreadsheet question Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2012-12-02 12:19 -0500
Re: form field/spreadsheet question Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-12-02 19:06 +0100
Re: form field/spreadsheet question Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2012-12-02 17:15 -0500
Re: form field/spreadsheet question Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-12-03 00:29 +0100
Re: form field/spreadsheet question Martin Leese <please@see.Web.for.e-mail.INVALID> - 2012-12-02 11:27 -0700
Re: form field/spreadsheet question "Jon" <no-reply@no-reply.com> - 2012-12-02 19:01 -0500
spreadsheet-to-Javascript translator "Jon" <no-reply@no-reply.com> - 2012-12-02 20:06 -0500
Re: spreadsheet-to-Javascript translator Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-12-03 10:26 -0800
Re: form field/spreadsheet question Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-12-03 02:42 +0000
csiph-web