Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #9301
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-25 09:43 -0700 |
| References | <po0slo$eqg$1@gioia.aioe.org> <03ff8449-f4f8-4c03-84d0-ab5efd539efa@googlegroups.com> <pobjcp$1dhl$1@gioia.aioe.org> <a1a3fe24-76dc-4d8a-8295-685f44f03de4@googlegroups.com> <podm0b$puj$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| Message-ID | <05d5ce44-c2a2-4fd4-bfc6-9b2ee6272cd2@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: .paid field vs .payment field |
| From | Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> |
On Tuesday, 25 September 2018 17:59:14 UTC+2, Victor Porton wrote: > No, there are links in BOTH directions: Where you completely miss what is what and the very distinction between a conceptual model and an implementation model. And that the conceptual part rather *drives*, not the other way round: e.g. "links" implement _relations_, and it's the relations that you should find and model to begin with. Just to mention the tip of an iceberg. But I know you have a background in mathematics, that's why I rather expected you to be able to at least parse precise statements and definitions, or know what a _relation_ is, etc., even if you have no clue about implementation. > You can read my abstract Nobel-level (yes, I know no Nobel in math) math > research at: http://www.mathematics21.org/algebraic-general-topology.html Sure, I have seen it in sci.math, crank! Not that sci.math is anymore that relevant, of course, but you are being utterly ridiculous... And now you get a job in software, as many, and as many with some mathematical background (and this includes 99% of the computer scientists), you think you are a genius of software... Well, sorry to break it on you, but software *engineering* is *the most complex engineering that there is*, and yours is just yet another instance of the Dunning-Kruger effect: to put it charitably. Indeed, it's pretty normal to be totally confused when first approaching real programming and real software (already the discipline of naming things is a total nightmare to the beginner): and not just because of the *tons* of *crap* that one usually finds online (Wikipedia on anything software *not* being any exception), but more fundamentally, I'll say it again, *software is the most complex engineering that there is*. So, I really do not have it with your cluelessness, I have it with your unmitigated arrogance and the frauds that necessarily come with it... Bottom line, learn to use question marks, that might help. Have a nice day, Julio
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
.paid field vs .payment field Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> - 2018-09-20 22:33 +0300
Re: .paid field vs .payment field Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> - 2018-09-22 16:40 +0300
Re: .paid field vs .payment field Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-09-22 07:11 -0700
Re: .paid field vs .payment field Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> - 2018-09-22 17:17 +0300
Re: .paid field vs .payment field Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-09-25 01:21 -0700
Re: .paid field vs .payment field Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> - 2018-09-25 18:59 +0300
Re: .paid field vs .payment field Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-09-25 09:43 -0700
Re: .paid field vs .payment field Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2018-09-22 08:53 -0700
csiph-web