Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4721 > unrolled thread

Do we have to be optimism ?

Back to article view | Back to comp.programming.threads

Contents

  Do we have to be optimism ? Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com> - 2018-11-10 13:46 -0800

#4721 — Do we have to be optimism ?

Hello,

Read this:


Do we have to be optimism ?

I have done political philosophy so that to explain
what is the essence of morality ?

But we have to be more smart..

Where is "love" in the essence of morality that i have
explained and defined ?

First there is no logical contradiction in my explanation
and definition, because morality is wanting at best to
correct to eliminate the defects or flaws
so that to attain flawlessness or absolute perfection
or absolute happiness, so since morality of today civilization
is balancing more perfection with our kind of civilization
so that to avoid at best savagery or desorder, and because the essence
of humans knows that "savagery" is bad, but how to interpret and how
to define savagery ? i think that we have to be more "confident"
and more "optimistic" because we are more efficient today and
we are more capable and we are more aware of the necessities
of today world, so we have to be more optimistic, so please
read all my following thoughts to understand better:

About the essence of morality

I have to do more political philosophy..

I said on my proof before of: morality is perfection at best, the following:

"Because morality exists because we have to avoid the bad
And we have to avoid the bad by also trying to maximize at best the good
And trying to maximize at best the good is also called: perfection at best
So morality is pushed towards absolute perfection
So that to be able to solve all our problems
And be absolute happiness that is the goal
But morality of today must at least be a decent morality
To avoid desorder and violence inside the system"

I have to be more precise:

When i say: And we have to avoid the bad by also trying to maximize at 
best the good

What is it that we call "good" in morality ?

A good is like we have to correct or eliminate a defect or flaw , and 
being morality is wanting to correct or eliminate the defects or flaws 
so that to attain reliability or flawlessness, because in morality we 
have to maximize at best the good and minimizing at best the bad, that 
means also that we have to maximize at best reliability so that to 
attain flawlessness , and this is called perfection at best since from 
the following definition: 
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection
perfection is also called freedom from fault or defect that we call: 
FLAWLESSNESS

Also i said above that:

"But morality of today must at least be a decent morality
To avoid desorder and violence inside the system"

Now can we ask the following question:

How can we measure decent morality ?

We can first ask a the following question:

How do we measure the truth ?

The truth is measured by our our senses and by our smartness and by 
rationalism and by empiricism !

So i think we can feel the relativeness of truth, i mean that the truth
is measured by a reference of measure , but there can be many references 
of measure  that gives different results of truth ! and thus we have to 
"prioritize" to be able to succeed ! i give you an example:
when i said (read below) that decent morality has to be measured by the 
reference of measure that is perfection at best so that the government
enforce more correctly "order", this government needs to prioritize
wich of the reference of measures of the truth are more "valid" !
so there is the reference of measure that is happiness or absolute 
happiness , but since law enforcement of "order" that is of a "highest"
priority, so the "truth" of: is it decent morality or not ? must be 
measured by the reference of measure that is perfection at best in 
itself so that to say that it is decent morality or not ! so here again 
you are noticing the relativeness of the truth since the reference of 
measure is choosen among many and is prioritized !

I will explain more by giving an example:

To be able to say that morality that is perfection at best and that
is guided by civilization that avoids at best savagery is a decent 
morality, you have to give weights or a order of priorities to
things or processes , you can for example say that "order" is of highest 
importance and perfection at best is of highest importance and you can 
say that richness is of a highest importance and you can infer that even 
if we are somewhat suffering to finally become rich and to be finally 
order and to be finally perfection at best, we can say that this process 
is decent morality because it gives results that are of highest 
importance for us.

Also i think that the tendency of today is that morality that is 
Perfection at best is balancing perfection with our kind of 
"civilization" so that to not being savagery or desorder.

Read the rest of my previous thoughts to understand better:

About my philosophy..

Here is a philosophy that is in accordance with
some parts of my political philosophy, read about it here:

Why Perfection Is The Enemy Of Done

https://www.forbes.com/sites/deeppatel/2017/06/16/why-perfection-is-the-enemy-of-done/#646838e54395


So read the rest , i have extended more my post so that
you understand more my thoughts:

About efficiency..

I am a more wise type of person, and i am more smart, this is
why i am quick at noticing a deficiency here, i have noticed that
many of you are hating and hating and using  more violence,
look at neo-nazism they are hating arabs and they are hating jews
and others are hating USA and others are hating China etc. etc.
it is full of "hate" and more violence, and this way of doing
is "inefficient" ! because the necessary requirement of today
is that we are a much more interconnected economies and
an interconnected world and this is why we have to know how
to "produce" efficiency from this interconnected world ! so
to produce efficiency we have to be capable of doing it !
this is smartness ! and to be able to be this smartness
we have to be able to appeal at our "righteousness" that is
in accordance with morality that is perfection at best so that
to be able to be the right perfection ! and i am noticing
that many of you here are not able yet to be this righteousness
that permit us to be the right perfection ! so i think
that we have to learn how to be more wise by being
more professionalism that knows how to manage and we have to be more 
awareness and we have to be correct realism that needs from us to be 
more "experienced" in life.

And as you have noticed i said that morality is perfection at best,
here is again my proof of it:

About the essence of morality

More political philosophy now..

If you have noticed on my writing i said that:

1- Morality is reliability

And i said that:

2- Morality is reliability at best

And i said that:

3- Morality is perfection at best.

But you will have the tendency to say that my above definitions
are not correct thinking, but here is my logical proof of my above
definitions:

When i said that:

1- Morality is reliability


Look at the dictionary here:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reliability

It says that:

Reliability is: The quality or state of being reliable.

So when i say that: Morality is reliability that means that it can
be Morality is the quality of being reliability, so it is like a
"concept" of reliability, that means that it can vary from 0% to 100%,
and we know that since morality is perfection at best from my following
logical proof:

Because morality exists because we have to avoid the bad
And we have to avoid the bad by also trying to maximize at best the good
And trying to maximize at best the good is also called: perfection at best
So morality is pushed towards absolute perfection
So that to be able to solve all our problems
And be absolute happiness that is the goal
But morality of today must at least be a decent morality
To avoid desorder and violence inside the system

And we know that it is inherent to maximizing at best the good that
it is also minimizing at best "failures", so i think my above logical
proof is correct.

So when i say above that:  Reliability is the quality of being reliable,
it means that the quality of being reliable is also measured by
measuring prefection at best, because being reliability is also
solving the problem to be able to be perfection at best.

Also when i say Morality is reliability, it means that it is not only
that reliability is the quality of being reliable, but it is
also a state of being reliable, because as i said in my above logical proof:

"But morality of today must at least be a decent morality
To avoid desorder and violence inside the system"

That means that reliability that is the quality of being reliable must
be at least decent morality, because without being at least decent
morality we can not call it morality, because there is like a constrain
over morality that must be at least decent morality to be able to call
it morality.

So here again we have to be smart, how can we "measure" to be able
to call it decent morality ? here again we have to be smart, there
is "absolute" measure and "relative" measure, so you can measure
morality by absolute measure that is "absolute perfection" that
is like absolute happiness, or you can measure morality relatively
by "happiness", or you can measure morality relatively by
the actual perfection at best in itself ! and i think that we have
to measure morality by the actual perfection at best and say
for example that this actual perfection at best is "order" that enforce 
calling morality a decent morality , so  the actual perfection at best 
can call morality a decent morality to enforce "order" that is "necessary".

Also i think that the tendency of today is that Perfection at best of 
today is balancing perfection with "civilization" so that to not being 
savagery or desorder.

And read the rest of my thoughts to understand more:

What is to be hebrew and what is to be jewish ?

I am speaking about jews that are racially jewish..

I am more smart, so what i will do is "prioritizing" by giving
"weights" to processes or things so that to find the best
way to maximize success !

This is how we must be smartness !

I think being hebrew or being racially a jewish is
related to morality that is perfection at best !

I mean that the very basis of Israel and jews of Israel
is that they wanted to be "morality" that is perfection at best !

So Israel to not loose its "soul" , Israel was
constrained by the necessities of past history and it has
adapted to those necessities of past history ! i am
speaking of past history of Israel..

But the Israel of today must be more smart
and understand that the way of doing today is
that we have to be more efficient since we have
become more efficient than past history !

So what is the very important "priority" of Israel ?
Israel has also to know how to be the right imperfections
to be able to be the right perfection ! so it has not
to make the same mistake as neo-nazism ! because neo-nazism
is racial purism that is not in accordance with efficiency of today !
so Israel has to know how to "tune" morality that is perfection at best
so that to be the "right" perfection ! but i think that Israel
is becoming more aware of the necessities of today that we
are  much more interconnected economies and we are an interconnected 
world and the necessary requirement is to be efficiency that knows
how to produce "efficiency" from the our interconnected today world, 
thus we have also to be able to be "dialog" with
others so that to be efficient, but i think that i am
more positive about Israel because we are becoming
more awareness and more efficiency.

I just said above that:

"Israel has also to know how to be the right imperfections
to be able to be the right perfection !"

Here is why: read what i wrote in my political philosophy in my 
following thoughts:

As you have noticed beauty and love has been created by wildness of
nature, and after that in the past since perfection was not enough to
ensure a decent morality , that is a decent perfection, humans have
behaved more violently with wars and by practicing slavery etc, so in
that past people were suffering more desorder and violence etc, so i
think we have to be wiser by looking at our actual morality that is
perfection at best,and to be able to judge it more "wisely", so do we
have to be pessimistic of our morality ? i don't think so, because there
is a also  a big constrain that morality has to be at least a decent
morality that is a decent perfection to avoid desorder and violence
inside the system, but here comes an important question: How to judge
that it is a decent morality ? here again there is also interpretation
of neo-nazism that is too violent that don't know how to tune
perfection correctly, because neo-nazism is racism and it is extremism
of "perfection" this is why they are discriminating too much, and this
is not perfection at best that is morality, because perfection(and thus
morality) is also knowing how to maximize at best success by minimizing
at best failures, here again to be successful at minimizing the failures
you have to "prioritize", this is why neo-nazism must know how
to accept the right "imperfections" to be able to be "correct"
perfection, this is why countries such as Canada and other european
countries are accepting arab immigrants even if some arab immigrants
are less beautiful than white europeans, because beautifulness is
interpreted as being less important than the fact that arab
immigrants are useful for economic growth and for the the social system
etc. and this is morality that prioritize to be able to be successful,
this is why neo-nazism that is too violent towards immigrants is not
correct morality that knows how to manage itself, so i don't
agree with neo-nazism and such idelogies that contain many bugs.


Read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:

More about the moral contract..

As you have noticed i am a white arab and i just written and posted here 
a new poem, i have also posted other of my poems , hope you have liked 
them, other than that you have to understand more my way of doing, i 
think that building the moral "contract" between me and others is 
something important, how do you think i am building it? my moral 
contract with others
is like creating one of my "jobs" that has as a goal to convince
the others that i am "useful" to society, not only that but i have
to be "usefulness" that is more "sophisticated", so this is why
you have seen me writing and posting in front of you my "poems",
those poems have as a goal to show to others that i am capable
of writing beautiful poems, so you are noticing my philosophy by reading 
my poems, i mean that showing that you are capable of writing beautiful 
poems is also my philosophy of life that has as a goal to build 
"confidence" between me and the others, since
this confidence that i am building is also like a "glue" that connects
me to others, so confidence is really important ! not only that
but my moral contract that i am building has also as a goal to show
that i am "useful" for the society, not only that but
i want also to show that i am more "smart" and that i am more 
"sophisticated" !
this is all part of my moral contract between me and you that i am 
building, so as you are noticing i am in accordance with my words
and i am more in accordance with morality that is perfection at best
(as i have proved it),  so as you are noticing that this perfection that 
we have to be is guided by the today "context" of the society and
the context of our world, and by observing this "context" we
notice that it needs more efficiency and more sophistication
and more professionalism to be capable of "surviving" better and
to be able to "transcend" our living conditions, so this
is why i am not only writing beautiful poems and posting them here,
but i am showing that i am more "professionalism" that is more 
technical, since i am a more serious computer programmer that
has invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations,
look for example at my  Scalable Parallel C++ Conjugate Gradient Linear 
System Solver Library here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-parallel-c-conjugate-gradient-linear-system-solver-library

As you have noticed it says the following:

"Sparse linear system solvers are ubiquitous in high performance 
computing (HPC) and often are the most computational intensive parts in 
scientific computing codes etc."

This is why i have "invented" my  Scalable Parallel C++ Conjugate 
Gradient Linear System Solver Library.

Here is another scalable algorithm that i have "invented",
read about it and download it from my website here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references

So as you are noticing i have "invented" many scalable algorithms
and there implementations,  and you will find some of them here on my 
website here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/

There are other scalable algorithms and there implementations that i 
have also invented and that i will sell to the following software 
companies: Microsoft or to Google or to Embarcadero or to Intel.

So as you are noticing "inventing" many scalable algorithms as i am
doing is also building the moral contract between me and you and it is 
also like creating one of my jobs.

Read the rest of my thought to understand better:

More political philosophy now..

Why do you think i am here to talk to you ?

I am a white arab who is building the moral contract between me
and you so that to bring "confidence" ! and i have talked about it
in some parts of my political philosophy ! so i think
that by reading my political philosophy you are feeling
more what is the essence of morality ! i love it this way because
it is responsability that brings more efficiency that is needed by our
democracy ! so all in all as you are noticing i am here to be 
responsable ! now what about the moral contract ? step by step
i am building and explaining my political philosophy to you,
my moral contract with you is that i have also to explain that
there is a necessary requirement for me, is that i have to know
how to play it smartly like playing  smartly a game of chess !
and when you are more smart you will have the tendency to
know more quickly what is the best way to maximize your success !
this is why you are seeing me talking about the best way to
maximize success ! for example you have to know that to be
more smart you have to be able in morality to define what is the right 
"imperfections" that give you the right perfection ! you see ? that's 
very important to know ! because i am a more serious computer programmer
and imperfections like "failing" to be able to be a success is part
of a more serious computer programming ! if you are like a "purist" that
doesn't want to fail at all in computer programming , that's not 
efficient ! this is the deficiency of neo-nazism and white
supremacism ! they have to know how to be imperfections(it is like being 
failures) so that to be successful ! but neo-nazism and white 
supremacism are more like racial "purism" and this purism is inefficient as
is inefficient socialism ! other than that we are today more efficient
than before ! and democracy is more efficient than before because
people are more educated and more experienced today and more aware today 
than before !
so they are becoming more efficient and this render democracy more 
efficient ! but can we ask ourselves the following question: is populism 
of today not in accordance with the fact that
we are becoming more efficient ? i don't think this is a logical 
contradiction because democracy is adapting quickly to the realities
and to the necessities of today ! and populism is also becoming
more aware of all the advantages of globalization(see the study
below that talks about it), so i think that democracy is
getting more and more efficient because of that ! also
i think that people are becoming more aware of the necessities
that the legislative branch or power of the government has to know how 
to be moderation to avoid extremism that hurts the system ! this is 
getting better and better , so we have to be positive about politics ! 
and i think that even Donald Trump is adapting more quickly to the 
necessities of today. So all in all i think that
you are understanding better my political philosophy, so
read my following thoughts to understand better:

The contrast of diversity..

I think that neo-nazism and white supremacism have a necessary 
requirement that is "order", also they want to be the right 
responsability because they want to be a "level" of perfection that is 
the right perfection for them, i am a white arab and i understand there 
requirements, but the problem with there philosophy is that it has 
difficiencies that must be corrected, first since i have proved that 
morality is perfection at best, and it is inherent to perfection at best 
that it must respect a certain decency and responsability that our 
civilization must be an "effort" that avoids at best "savagery", also
we notice that the essence of our democracy is that we have
to know how to be "moderation" in the legislative power so that to
avoid extremism that causes violence and that hurts the system and that 
can cause a civil war, so i think that white supremacism and neo-nazism
are constrained by the actual realities of politics and the necessities
of today that i think don't accept neo-nazism and white supremacism 
because they are too much risk and they are too dangerous for the 
system, also i have noticed that neo-nazism and white supremacism are 
racial "purism" that is not what we call efficiency , because i have 
explained that optimization of today is "prioritizing" to be able to be
successful, so if you look at the necessities of immigration of
today is that with immigration we want to improve productivity and want
to improve economic growth and want to improve the social system
and also because of the low birth rate of many western countries,
so i don't think that racial purism of neo=nazism and white supremacism
is in accordance with morality that is perfection at best as
i have proved it, also neo-nazism and white supremacism
have the tendency to easily be hateful towards immigrants, but i don't 
think that this is the right way, because i think that we have first to
be the right intellectual effort and be correct realism that permit us 
to be awareness and that permit us to be capable to think correctly and 
be capable of
solving problems, and i don't think that it is the case of neo-nazism
and white supremacism, so i think that neo-nazism and white supremacism
have to be reformed to be in accordance with the right efficiency.


And here is the rest of my previous post:

There is many ways to write a poem, but as you have
noticed that my poems are both poems of love and they are also 
"philosophical" poems, and how do i write them ? it is like listening at 
the wisdom of silence and listening at the wisdom of the desert  and 
listening at the wisdom around us, it is a hindsight that i have on 
different situations and on humans etc and it permits me to write my 
poems and to extend them.. for example in my last poem, i was listening 
at the wisdom of silence and the desert and this has showed me the way
and this has learned me more on humans, that humans are like
a glass that needs to be filled with knowledge and perfection and 
experience and love and compassion etc. and this has to be guided by our
need to be diversity that is in accordance with morality
that is perfection at best as i have proved it in my previous
posts, this is why morality has to know how to be the
diversity of the "right" imperfections to give the right perfection, and
as you have noticed that morality that is perfection at best
is guided by our need of a decent civilization that avoids
at best savagery, this is why in my previous poem i
wrote about "moderation" that is "faithful" to us and that
is wisdom, because also it is part of the essence of democracy,
and we can understand it because read  what i wrote about it in my 
political philosophy:

I think the success of  USA has to be that USA has to understand the
way USA is governed, take for example the separation of powers,
What is the separation of powers?

The U.S. Constitution set up three separate but equal branches of 
government: the legislative branch, or Congress, makes the law; the 
executive, led by the president, executes the law; and the judicial, or 
courts, interprets the law.

But we have to be smarter than that, the separation of powers is not 
"sufficient", so we have to be smarter and know that the legislative 
branch has to understand how to make the legislative branch successful !
look for example at USA , its congress is constituted with both 
conservatives and democrats, but this legislative branch has to 
understand a very important requirement that the legislative branch has 
to know how to be "moderation" to not cause violence or civil war
inside the system ! this is the key to success ! thus the legislative 
branch of USA has to avoid "extremism" that causes violence or civil war 
inside the system , so it has to know how to be "moderation" !


And i invite you to reread my new poem to understand more:

Here is my new poem that i wrote fast,
read it listening at the same time
to the following song:

Jean Ferrat, La complainte de Pablo Neruda

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FnT5rAd8cEY

Here is my new poem:

===

Our silence cry patience
And our hearts cry love and justice
Like the blue sky
Like the heartbeat of pretty birds
Since we hear the pretty song of the nightingales
And the oasis of the desert tells us about wisdom
So we walk towards the light
Like a rainbow
Because my story is multicolored
So I go back to my multicolored land
Because diversity is wisdom
Since we are like a glass
Since we feel the desert
Since we feel the silence
Like the wind blowing
Like the cold and the hot
Like the day and night
It's with this contrast
That the sense guides our essence
Because diversity is also the path
Because diversity is also the light
So when I hear the wind
And when I look at the sun
I see your heart beating
Like the beat of the wings of the little birds
Because like the delicacy and like caresses
Moderation is faithful to us and it is wisdom
Because we are like a glass
Since we feel the desert
Since we feel the silence
Thus we are love and we are compassion
Like the wind blowing
Like the cold and the hot
Like the day and night
We are perfection and we are progress
Because diversity is also the path
Because diversity is also the light
So when I hear the wind
And when I look at the sun
I see your heart beating
Like the beat of the wings of the little birds
Because like the delicacy and like caresses
Moderation is faithful to us and it is wisdom

===



And about globalization..

1- Globalization has created new opportunities for firms to develop 
business models and offerings that have a higher intensity of R&D, 
innovation and capital. Many of the goods and services that have entered 
the market over the past decades have exactly those features, and 
without globalization, firms would have been forced to continue with 
business models that work with a smaller volume of sales. Firms have 
been able to specialize more than before and, as a consequence, human 
capital and the share of skilled jobs in the economy have grown 
remarkably. Today, advanced economies have a greater share of 
better-paid and better-skilled jobs than ever before.

2- Globalization has increased real wages for people in Western 
economies by making products cheaper or reducing the pace of price 
increases. If the typical goods that every household purchases had 
followed domestic rather than international price developments, 
consumers would have been poorer and saddled with products of lower quality.

3- Globalization has made significant contributions to productivity 
growth and, as a consequence, further raised living standards. 
Globalization has been particularly important for enabling new 
technology to spread fast across markets. In the long term, it is the 
speed of technological improvement that sets the pace for how richer 
societies get.how societies get richer

However, trade and investment are not growing fast anymore, and there is 
much suggesting that the decline in trade and investment growth is one 
explanation to the failing dynamism of Western economies. While some 
appreciate the decline in the growth of globalization, those who care 
about the prosperity of a society should deplore it and make efforts for 
the world economy to return to high levels of trade growth.


Read the following study to know more about globalization:

The Economic Benefits of Globalization for Business and Consumers

http://ecipe.org/publications/the-economic-benefits-of-globalization-for-business-and-consumers/


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.programming.threads

csiph-web