Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4525 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-08-04 00:46 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-08-04 00:46 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.programming.threads
Again about Parallel ForEach and ParallelFor.. Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> - 2018-08-04 00:46 -0400
| From | Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-04 00:46 -0400 |
| Subject | Again about Parallel ForEach and ParallelFor.. |
| Message-ID | <pk2t10$c62$2@dont-email.me> |
Hello, Again about Parallel ForEach and ParallelFor.. I just wrote this: "I think that this Parallel ForEach and ParallelFor are like futulities, because they don't bring "enough" high level abstraction to consider them interesting, because i think my Threadpool with priorities that scales very well is capable of easily emulating Parallel ForEach with "priorities" and ParallelFor with "priorities" that scale very well, so no need to implement Parallel ForEach or Parallel For." But to be "nicer", i think i will soon implement both Parallel ForEach with "priorities" that scales very well and ParallelFor with "priorities" that scales very well using my Threadpool with priorities that scales very well, and they will be integrated as methods with my Threadpool with priorities that scales very well, so that you will be happy. So stay tunned ! Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to top | Article view | comp.programming.threads
csiph-web