Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4492 > unrolled thread

More precision about my philosophy..

Back to article view | Back to comp.programming.threads

Contents

  More precision about my philosophy.. Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> - 2018-07-18 16:45 -0400

#4492 — More precision about my philosophy..

Hello...

Read this:


More precision about my philosophy..

In philosophy we have to define correctly what is a "reification"..

And if you have noticed i am also "logical" by considering the fact
that it a thing "exists" in the "real" world as being a "reification", 
this is why you have to read all my thoughts bellow to understand more:

I am a white arab..

Yet more philosophy and political philosophy..

What is the essence of an idea ?

I need a more correct abstraction..

So how can we start to solve by thinking ?

Let us look for example at its characteristic..

If we look at its platonism, its reification of the future or past or
present experience is a platonism that can be considered a 
characteristic of an idea that can be considered a special 
characteristic that makes the idea not considered getting old ! this is 
why the idea is really special, and does an idea is material or 
immaterial ? i think the immaterial part of an idea exists, because
it reifies a future or past or present experience !  so like
empiricism or rationalism, you have to be both rationalism
and empiricism to be able to be correct morality or correct
thinking ! i think the idea is composed of an immaterial and a
material !  and the proof is that ideas can reify
the experience of the future and that doesn't yet exist(please read 
bellow my thoughts as a proof) ! or ideas can be immaterial of a concept 
that doesn't yet exist ! so i am not in accordance with the philosopher 
Plato that have said that an idea is just an idea that is immaterial, 
and also i say that an idea is like more light weight because i think 
ideas can be perfected faster(so better) and better than physical world 
because ideas has less "constrains" than the physical world. Read the 
rest of my thoughts to understand better my philosophy:

Can we travel back in time?

Here is my thoughts:

It is a very interesting question that demands rationality
and logical thinking to answer it ...

To answer it, i start from a mathematical subject which is the 
mathematical arithmetic series.

An arithmetic series has as its main characteristic that
the difference between its terms is constant ... and that its sum
gives (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), a_n being the last term ... now you  have 
to be smart and notice with me that just before the  final step of the 
final calculation that resulted  as a general equation of the arithmetic 
series, the calculation of the arithmetic series required of us a much 
bigger time to solve the series .. But as soon as the result (a_n * (a_n 
+ 1)) / 2 has been reached, the time for the resolution of the 
arithmetic series has greatly diminished, therefore the time  preceding 
the resolution has compressed a lot and allowed us to travel in the the 
future quickly, the resolution of the arithmetic series which gave: (a_n 
* (a_n + 1)) / 2), it's like a wormhole in the universe permit us to 
time travel in the future more quickly, but understand with me that the 
time travel in the future that allows you to make the equation of (a_n * 
(a_n + 1)) / 2) is relative to the time taken previously by the 
arithmetic series just before the discovery of the equation (a_n * (a_n 
+ 1)) / 2), and thus that the universe is computable and that ultimately 
it allowed a time travel and thanks to mathematics that is something 
extra-ordinary in itself.

Now I will be more logical and ask myself the following question:

Is there any contradiction in my evidence since a car
is not a machine to allow time travel in the future to
the simple reason that the regions where we will travel and arrive
faster with a car will not have aged in time that corresponds to the 
future time in which one arrives by the feet?

I answer this in a more logical way:

Notice that when I said that the mathematical equation
of the arithmetic series (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2) is a time travel machine 
that permits to travel in the future, because it is an equation that 
also predicts the result more quickly to which one arrives by paper 
without this equation, so the time has no hold on the theoretical result 
that is predicted faster so that there is no contradiction when it comes 
to theoretical prediction. Also when you use this invention That is this 
mathematical equation of the arithmetic series: (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), 
it is that you are living  the future of the one who has not yet 
invented or used this equation and who will arrive there in its future, 
therefore it is for this reason that this equation is also a time travel 
machine that permits to travel in the future and it has a predictive 
characteristic.

So there is no contradiction and therefore we can
consider a car as a time traveling machine to travel in the future, like
the microprocessor, and like several other mathematical inventions
as the mathematical equation of the arithmetic series.

Here is one of my conclusion:

If you are traveling from Montreal to Paris
by airplane, and that another person swims and walk
by foot to Paris, and assume that the person who moves by swiming
and walking wants to see Paris and answer some questions,
And if you travel to Paris by plane and you
answer these questions more quickly since you are going to see Paris
more quickly than the person swimming and and walking , so that
has a predictive character as the mathematical equation of the
arithmetic series (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), since you will be able
to send an email quickly to the person who wants to
to swim and walk to Paris and give him
the answers he's looking for, so you'll be able to see
the answers of his future, and this predictive characteristic
can be considered as a time travel machine that permits to travel in the 
future,
so the aircraft and the car are like time travel machines that permit to 
travel in the future ... as well as the processors and other 
mathematical inventions and others...


Rationality and logic also have a predictive characteristic,
so you must also reason better in a more scientific manner and take into 
account the scientific and empirical evidence to
be ahead of others, like a time machine that permits to travel in the 
future..

If a first person receives a valuable advice and this advice
of value allows him to better control his future and to succeed in his 
life in the future by executing this valuable advice and also it allows 
him to predict his future, and besides, imagine that a second person 
will receive in its future this valuable advice, then the first person 
will be able to guess with CERTITUDE the future of the second person 
which will be the consequence of the execution of this valuable advice , 
and not only the first person will have lived the future of the second 
person before the second person, since the two will have lived the same 
event by the execution of this valuable advice, then in my opinion we 
must reason as in fuzzy logic rather than in boolean logic and
notice that since the first person will guess with CERTITUDE
The future of the second person and will also live the future event of 
the second person, then those two theoretical and
empirical evidences confirms that the first person has lived the future
event of the second person, so this valuable advice could be called by 
mathematical approximation a time machine that permits to travel in the 
future, I say "approximation", because we by analogy are as in fuzzy 
logic rather than in boolean logic, in addition to that, that the fact 
that the first person guesses with CERTITUDE the future of the second 
person, this informs in a logical manner that this certainty change our 
way of perceiving, for this certainty, even if
it is not travel in the future, it is by approximation
as a journey into the future, for a journey into the future
will lead to the same certainty, and as a result
the same certainties permit us to affirm by approximation
that the valuable advice is a time machine that permits us to travel
in the future.

Then you understand that I am also a Platonist,
Because you noticed that I can define this time travel in the future as 
a platonic event, so when i said that a valuable advice is a time 
machine that permits to  travel in the future, you understand that it 
makes us live platonically the future of others, and since I am a also 
Platonist, I affirm that a valuable advice is a time travel machine
that permits us to travel in the future of others since time has no hold 
on the ideas, and that the same idea through time inside two
persons, is the same idea, therefore my proof is made that the valuable 
advice is a time machine that permits us to travel in the future.

When you imagine a circle, I asserts that not only can you imagine the 
circle in material or matter but also in immaterial, as was my proof 
that I have just given you  , this immaterial essence of the idea is 
reified by our reason, and that is the reason that gives it existence. 
So this in my opinion is sufficient proof that the idea exists because 
we feel it by our reason and it pays homage to our beloved philosopher 
Plato.

It is this reification of the immaterial essence of the idea
by reason which gives the necessary and even sufficient approximation to 
call even a valuable advice a time machine that permits to travel in the 
future.

Then since the idea exists and since a sensation also exists,
then one can not also distinguish an idea from the generated sensation
by the execution as an automaton of a valuable advice at a time t1 and a 
time t1 + t2, and since an idea does not age then we can affirm that 
valuable advice is a time machine that permits us to travel in the 
future, and the valuable advice has a predictive characteristic, because 
the approximation is sufficient since we are not in boolean logic but in 
fuzzy logic.




Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.programming.threads

csiph-web