Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4297 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-18 22:45 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-05-18 22:45 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.programming.threads
Sorry i correct.. Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> - 2018-05-18 22:45 -0400
| From | Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-18 22:45 -0400 |
| Subject | Sorry i correct.. |
| Message-ID | <pdo34u$nna$4@dont-email.me> |
Hello.... Sorry i correct.. To be more precise... C++ and Delphi and FreePascal can approximate better the safety of Rust by using more tools, and i have given you a solution of that in my previous posts that uses variants to emulate strict-type safety of Rust, so from this we can affirm that the sum of mean time between failures will become much more big using those methods, so that it can save us more money for example. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to top | Article view | comp.programming.threads
csiph-web