Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4252 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-04 00:41 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-05-04 00:41 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.programming.threads
About Lockfree algorithms Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> - 2018-05-04 00:41 -0400
| From | Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-04 00:41 -0400 |
| Subject | About Lockfree algorithms |
| Message-ID | <pcga6s$nlp$2@dont-email.me> |
Hello.. About Lockfree algorithms I am more experienced now, and i will give my point of view on Lockfree and algorithms: Lockfree algorithms are bad because they are prone to starvation or to much longer waiting time for a number of threads, they are faster than Lock based algorithms when there is more context switches between threads, but they are prone to starvation or to much longer waiting time for a number of threads, and this is not good, so as you notice that Lockfree and Lock based algorithms have there advantages and disadvantages. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to top | Article view | comp.programming.threads
csiph-web