Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4239 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-02 14:04 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-05-02 14:04 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.programming.threads
More precision.. Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> - 2018-05-02 14:04 -0400
| From | Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-02 14:04 -0400 |
| Subject | More precision.. |
| Message-ID | <pccujp$hqf$2@dont-email.me> |
Hello, More precision.. Again about Lockfree algorithms I wrote in my previous post about Lockfree algorithms, i think that Lockfree algorithms without an appropriate Backoff algorithm and a Jitter are much slower than Lock based algorithms(read my previous posts to understand it), so you have to add the following Backoff+Jitter and Lockfree algorithms will become faster than Lock based algorithms, read the following carefully: https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/architecture/exponential-backoff-and-jitter/ So now i will finish soon my new FIFO queue that is node based and that is "Waitfree" on the producer side and Lockfree on the consumer side, it will use my new "scalable" reference counting and it will use an efficient Backoff algorithm with an efficient Jitter to be faster than Lock based algorithms. And i will finish soon my new Lockfree LIFO stack that will use an efficient Backoff algorithm with an efficient Jitter to be faster than lock based algorithms. They will be work with C++ and Delphi and FreePascal, so stay tuned ! Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to top | Article view | comp.programming.threads
csiph-web