Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4142 > unrolled thread
| Started by | computer45 <computer45@cyber.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-04-05 15:11 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-04-05 15:11 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.programming.threads
About the essence of "intelligence" computer45 <computer45@cyber.com> - 2018-04-05 15:11 -0400
| From | computer45 <computer45@cyber.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-05 15:11 -0400 |
| Subject | About the essence of "intelligence" |
| Message-ID | <pa5scn$t86$8@dont-email.me> |
Hello.. Read this: About the essence of "intelligence" I think you are getting stupid by defining IQ, the definition of IQ does not take into account the right requirements ! Your IQ tests are not correct ! i am more smart to notice it: When IQ tests are testing "logic" and "logical" reasoning they are not testing correctly ! Because in logic and logical reasoning we have two things: being capable of organizing logically, like being more "articulated" "logically", and capable of reasoning logically small IQ tests , this is more expressiveness to be able to feel it, because you will find that some people can solve small logical IQ tests , but can not "organize" more logically and more bigger logically and are not capable of being more "logically" "articulated", they have a defect and this makes them less smart ! i don't think IQ tests are capable of detecting it and measuring it, so your IQ tests are not the correct way of measuring. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to top | Article view | comp.programming.threads
csiph-web