Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming.threads > #3755 > unrolled thread

I was thinking about Transactional memory more..

Started byrami17 <rami17@rami17.net>
First post2017-05-06 21:15 -0400
Last post2017-05-06 21:15 -0400
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.programming.threads


Contents

  I was thinking about Transactional memory more.. rami17 <rami17@rami17.net> - 2017-05-06 21:15 -0400

#3755 — I was thinking about Transactional memory more..

Fromrami17 <rami17@rami17.net>
Date2017-05-06 21:15 -0400
SubjectI was thinking about Transactional memory more..
Message-ID<oels9m$b1t$3@dont-email.me>
Hello......


I was thinking about Transactional memory more..

Here is the problem of optimistic transactional memory:

If there is more conflicts between reads and writes you have to
rollback etc. and this will be less energy efficient than pessimistic 
locking mechanisms and it will be less faster.


So i think that my C++ Synchronization objects library is still useful..

You can download it from:

https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/c-synchronization-objects-library




Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.programming.threads


csiph-web