Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #3697 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ramine <toto@toto.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-17 19:00 -0400 |
| Last post | 2017-03-17 19:00 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.programming.threads
C++ compilers... Ramine <toto@toto.net> - 2017-03-17 19:00 -0400
| From | Ramine <toto@toto.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-17 19:00 -0400 |
| Subject | C++ compilers... |
| Message-ID | <oahplb$9hp$3@dont-email.me> |
Hello.... I have noticed that C++ compilers have inherited deficiencies of the past, because you can not change the memory manager easily and efficiently, but in Delphi and FreePascal it is easy to do it. Look at my nedmalloc interfaces for Delphi and Delphi XE versions and FreePascal: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/nedmalloc-interfaces-for-delphi-and-delphi-xe-versions-and-freepascal It's easy to install this scalable memory manager in Delphi and FreePascal compilers and it's efficient to install it, but in C++ compilers it's not. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to top | Article view | comp.programming.threads
csiph-web