Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #2646 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ramine <ramine@1.1> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-10-31 14:59 -0700 |
| Last post | 2014-10-31 14:59 -0700 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.programming.threads
Scalable RWLocks Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-10-31 14:59 -0700
| From | Ramine <ramine@1.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-10-31 14:59 -0700 |
| Subject | Scalable RWLocks |
| Message-ID | <m30m59$jk4$2@dont-email.me> |
Hello, I have just read the following PhD paper about NUMA-Aware Reader-Writer Locks... Here it is: http://mcg.cs.tau.ac.il/papers/ppopp2013-rwlocks.pdf You will notice that it is scaling better than the DV Read-Writer lock cause i think there is less NUMA nodes inthis Reader-Writer lock than CPU ids in the DV side, so it makes the DV side more expensive in the writer side. so it makes the serial part in the Amdahl equation bigger , so it makes the DV Reader-Writer lock less scalable... but the DV Reader-Writer lock is good also. But i have also invented and inplemented scalable RWLocks , here they are: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/scalable-rwlock The scalability of my scalable RWLocks is good at 1% to 3% of writes, even more, i have invented scalable and starvation-free RWLocks, you will find them inside the same zipfile and this makes my scalable RWLocks attractive and powerful i think. Please notice that the Reader-Writer lock that is included inside the Omnithread library is using an expensive atomic operation, on the reader side , so it makes it less scalable than my scalable RWLocks, so i advice you to use my scalable RWLocks cause they are more powerful and they are really good. You can download my scalable RWLocks: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/scalable-rwlock Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to top | Article view | comp.programming.threads
csiph-web