Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #2320 > unrolled thread
| Started by | aminer <aminer@toto.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-05-08 13:13 -0700 |
| Last post | 2014-05-08 13:13 -0700 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.programming.threads
Parallel Sort Library version 3.1 aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2014-05-08 13:13 -0700
| From | aminer <aminer@toto.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-08 13:13 -0700 |
| Subject | Parallel Sort Library version 3.1 |
| Message-ID | <lkgdvq$7do$1@news.albasani.net> |
Hello, I have updated my Parallel Sort Library to version 3.1, i have just corrected a bug and it is stable now, and it gives better scalability than my Parallel Quicksort. The best case complexity of my Parallel Sort Library using mergesort is: ((n/p)* log(n/p)) + O(n/p) p: is the number of cores the ((n/p)* log(n/p)) is the complexity of the sorting part. O(n/p) is the best case complexity of the merging part. so the best case complexity is: ((n/p)* log(n/p)) The worst case complexity of parallel sort library using mergesort is: ((n/p)* log(n/p)) + O(n) the ((n/p)* log(n/p)) is the complexity of the sorting part. O(n) is the worst case complexity of the merging part. so the worst case complexity of parallelsort using mergesort is approximatly: O(n) You can download my Parallel Sort library 3.1 from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/parallel-sort-library Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to top | Article view | comp.programming.threads
csiph-web