Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming.threads > #2229 > unrolled thread

Re: More about waitfree and lockfree

Back to article view | Back to comp.programming.threads

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: More about waitfree and lockfree "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> - 2014-04-23 12:52 -0700
    Re: More about waitfree and lockfree aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2014-04-23 15:58 -0700
    Re: More about waitfree and lockfree aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2014-04-23 16:08 -0700
    Re: More about waitfree and lockfree aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2014-04-23 16:19 -0700
      Re: More about waitfree and lockfree aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2014-04-23 16:32 -0700
        Re: More about waitfree and lockfree aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2014-04-23 16:41 -0700

#2229 — Re: More about waitfree and lockfree

> "MitchAlsup"  wrote in message 
> news:cd1edc26-da1f-40e1-ad24-7979e621e935@googlegroups.com...

> On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 7:20:54 PM UTC-5, aminer wrote:
> > Hello...

> I have a suggestion for you.
> Continue to post, but never change the subject line again.

nice and succinct Mitch!

:^D      Thanks.



Well, IMVHO, animer seems to be fond of attributing my
name to a point were it can be confused with me actually
working with him. This makes me want to   ASK  him to
_refrain_ wrt creating  content that seems to suggest that
we have ever worked together.

:^O

Never happened.



My algorithms are my own work. I have never worked with "animer".

Blah!

:^( 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#2230

On 4/23/2014 12:52 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> "MitchAlsup"  wrote in message
>> news:cd1edc26-da1f-40e1-ad24-7979e621e935@googlegroups.com...
>
>> On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 7:20:54 PM UTC-5, aminer wrote:
>> > Hello...
>
>> I have a suggestion for you.
>> Continue to post, but never change the subject line again.
>
> nice and succinct Mitch!
>
> :^D      Thanks.
>
>
>
> Well, IMVHO, animer seems to be fond of attributing my
> name to a point were it can be confused with me actually
> working with him. This makes me want to   ASK  him to
> _refrain_ wrt creating  content that seems to suggest that
> we have ever worked together.
>
> :^O
>
> Never happened.
>
>
>
> My algorithms are my own work. I have never worked with "animer".
>
> Blah!
>
> :^(



My dear Chriss Thomasson, your algorithm is your own work that's a true, 
but what i have tried to do is make your algorithm available to
the Object pascal community, you have given me this algorithm
a long time ago, and if you have noticed i have put your name
as the author of the algorithm and i have put my name as the author
of the Object pascal source code and as the author of SemaMonitor,
so i don't think there is a problem. What do you think ?


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2231

Hello,

And here is the algorithm that you have given me in pascal
source code a long time ago:

Please read this:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/comp.programming.threads/Amine$20Moulay$20Ramdane$20and$20bakery/comp.programming.threads/U4-K-a4iWKs/jqZH1plUQMMJ


So what i have done is wrote it in Object pascal source code
and i have added to it my SemaMonitor, and i have wrote
your name as the author of the algorithm and my name as
the author of the Object pascal source code and the author of 
SemaMonitor. Is there any problem ?

My dear Chriss Thomasson, your algorithm is your own work that's  true, 
but what i have tried to do is make your algorithm available to
the Object pascal community, you have given me this algorithm
a long time ago.


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2232

Please read all the following:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/comp.programming.threads/Amine$20Moulay$20Ramdane$20and$20bakery/comp.programming.threads/U4-K-a4iWKs/jqZH1plUQMMJ 


My dear Chriss, as you have noticed , you have given me this algorithm 
in a pascal source code a long time ago , and you have told
me in replyin to my post that every element in the array must be of a 
size of a cache-line and the array must be 64 bytes aligned
i have done all that and i have rewrote it in Object pascal
not pascal and i have added my SemaMonitor.. and i have wrote
your name as the author of the algorithm and my name as
the author of the Object pascal source code and the author
of SemaMonitor, after that i have made the source code available
to the Object pascal community. Is there any problem Chriss ?



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2234

Chriss, after you have read all my previous posts...
if there is any problem, and you told me to delete it
from my website, i will delete it.

If you told me that's ok , i will keep it.


What do you think Chriss ?



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.


On 4/23/2014 4:19 PM, aminer wrote:
>
>
>
> Please read all the following:
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/comp.programming.threads/Amine$20Moulay$20Ramdane$20and$20bakery/comp.programming.threads/U4-K-a4iWKs/jqZH1plUQMMJ
>
>
> My dear Chriss, as you have noticed , you have given me this algorithm
> in a pascal source code a long time ago , and you have told
> me in replyin to my post that every element in the array must be of a
> size of a cache-line and the array must be 64 bytes aligned
> i have done all that and i have rewrote it in Object pascal
> not pascal and i have added my SemaMonitor.. and i have wrote
> your name as the author of the algorithm and my name as
> the author of the Object pascal source code and the author
> of SemaMonitor, after that i have made the source code available
> to the Object pascal community. Is there any problem Chriss ?
>
>
>
> Thank you,
> Amine Moulay Ramdane.
>
>
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2236

Hello Chriss Thomasson

After i have read your posts, i think that you don't
want me to make your algorithm available to the Object
pascal community. So i will delete it right now from my website.

And i will stay with my other concurrent FIFO queue
that is lockfree on the pop() side... it has scored a decent
throughput and that's ok for me.


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.programming.threads

csiph-web