Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #5907 > unrolled thread
| Started by | aminer68@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2020-07-13 14:09 -0700 |
| Last post | 2020-07-13 16:39 -0700 |
| Articles | 2 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.programming.threads
About why is memory reclamation so important? aminer68@gmail.com - 2020-07-13 14:09 -0700
Re: About why is memory reclamation so important? aminer68@gmail.com - 2020-07-13 16:39 -0700
| From | aminer68@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-13 14:09 -0700 |
| Subject | About why is memory reclamation so important? |
| Message-ID | <e67ca9e9-a243-4cc9-bf74-cf0946a4c557o@googlegroups.com> |
Hello, About why is memory reclamation so important? I am a white arab, and here is one more proof that i am smart like a genius: Read the following from a PhD researcher: http://concurrencyfreaks.blogspot.com/2017/08/why-is-memory-reclamation-so-important.html It says the following: "Atomic Reference Counting is just what the name says, it's a "reference counting" technique but with atomics. The details are a bit more tricky than your usual reference counting (aka smart pointers), but it's still graspable for most. They can be implemented in a wait-free way (in x86) but they have two main drawbacks: they're slow and they aren't universal. They're slow because whenever we have to traverse a list of nodes we need to atomically increment a counter in one node and decrement a counter in another... even though we're just reading." I think that this PhD researcher is not so smart, because look at my following invention of a Scalable reference counting that is Wait-free: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references My invention above is really powerful, and it is a proof that i am smart like a genius. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | aminer68@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-13 16:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c2559cb6-e89d-4087-8bae-c43311801dfco@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #5907 |
On Monday, July 13, 2020 at 5:09:17 PM UTC-4, amin...@gmail.com wrote: > Hello, > > > About why is memory reclamation so important? > > I am a white arab, and here is one more proof that i am > smart like a genius: > > Read the following from a PhD researcher: > > http://concurrencyfreaks.blogspot.com/2017/08/why-is-memory-reclamation-so-important.html > > It says the following: > > "Atomic Reference Counting is just what the name says, it's a "reference counting" technique but with atomics. The details are a bit more tricky than your usual reference counting (aka smart pointers), but it's still graspable for most. They can be implemented in a wait-free way (in x86) but they have two main drawbacks: they're slow and they aren't universal. They're slow because whenever we have to traverse a list of nodes we need to atomically increment a counter in one node and decrement a counter in another... even though we're just reading." > > > I think that this PhD researcher is not so smart, because > look at my following invention of a Scalable reference counting > that is Wait-free: > > https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references > > My invention above is really powerful, and it is a proof that > i am smart like a genius. > > > Thank you, > Amine Moulay Ramdane. Read this: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.programming.threads/F_cF4ft1Qic Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.programming.threads
csiph-web