Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming.threads > #6964

Re: Here is my new invention

Newsgroups comp.programming.threads
From Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com>
Subject Re: Here is my new invention
References <2b095e21-a54d-4335-8a4a-9a6fb5164cc2n@googlegroups.com> <sjvchc$onp$1@dont-email.me> <e3b7732e-2ef3-4d72-9c0d-755c6b8db327n@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID <vlL8J.29732$4X4.26212@fx27.iad> (permalink)
Organization usenet-news.net
Date 2021-10-11 00:14 +0000

Show all headers | View raw


On 2021-10-10, Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 2:48:14 PM UTC-4, Bonita Montero wrote:
>> Am 10.10.2021 um 20:34 schrieb Amine Moulay Ramdane: 
>> > Hello, 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also 
>> > invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. 
>> > 
>> > Here is my new invention of a fast, and scalable and starvation-free and
>> > fair and lightweight Multiple-Readers-Exclusive-Writer Lock called
>> > LW_RWLockX, and now i have included two units that are called MREWEx and
>> > LighweightMREWEx that include TMultiReadExclusiveWriteSynchronizer and
>> > TLightweightMREW classes that are scalable and starvation-free and fair
>> > since they are using my Scalable LW_RWLockX that is starvation-free and
>> > fair, also BeginRead() and BeginWrite() of LightweightMREWEx are reentrant
>> > (recursive), so in other words, if a thread already called BeginWrite(),
>> > it can call BeginWrite() again and it will succeed and it will not
>> > deadlock, and the same applies to BeginRead(), please take a look at them
>> > inside the source code of my units.
>> You're an idiot ! 
>> 
>> Multiple reader, exlusive writer locks are *never* starvation-free. 
>> Readers can hold the lock infinetely and weiters as well.
>
> This holding the lock infinetely and wreiters is not counted, since 
> you have just to use it correctly and avoid this case, 
If used correctly you don't need any lock :P
Locks are for synchronization, which is not good thing :P

>
>
> Thank you,
> Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Bravo Amine!
LOVE&PEACE

-- 

7-77-777
Evil Sinner!
with software, you repeat same experiment, expecting different results...

Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Here is my new invention Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com> - 2021-10-10 11:34 -0700
  Re: Here is my new invention Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-10-10 20:48 +0200
    Re: Here is my new invention Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com> - 2021-10-10 12:02 -0700
    Re: Here is my new invention Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com> - 2021-10-10 12:09 -0700
      Re: Here is my new invention Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-11 00:14 +0000
      Re: Here is my new invention Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-10-11 08:11 +0200
    Re: Here is my new invention Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com> - 2021-10-10 12:11 -0700
    Re: Here is my new invention Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-11 00:11 +0000

csiph-web