Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #7387
| From | Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads |
| Subject | Re: More of my philosophy about my new inventions and more.. |
| Date | 2022-02-17 21:23 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <sumarm$mp7$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <90b6051a-ec4a-4e71-a34c-30e303101d9en@googlegroups.com> <sum7iu$jmr$1@dont-email.me> <709fc805-becd-4074-a827-8563ae5b9d6an@googlegroups.com> |
Am 17.02.2022 um 20:41 schrieb Amine Moulay Ramdane: > On Thursday, February 17, 2022 at 2:27:30 PM UTC-5, Bonita Montero wrote: >> Am 17.02.2022 um 20:02 schrieb Amine Moulay Ramdane: >>> Hello, >>> >>> >>> More of my philosophy about my new inventions and more.. >>> >>> I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms.. >>> >>> >>> I think i am smart, and i say that x86 processor family features a fairly strict memory model that only allows the reorderings of loads before independent store operations, so i have just invented a fully Lockfree FIFO bounded queue and a fully Lockfree LIFO bounded stack that also run on x86 processor family and they are much more powerful than my following inventions: >> Lock-free queues totally suck since they have to be polled. >> The only lock-free structure that is useful is a lock-free stack >> for pooing objects and handling back items to a thread like with >> modern memory-allocators. > > > Typically, polling a lock-free queue works best when the queue nearly always has entries, a blocking queue works best when the queue is nearly always empty. Forget it - no one wants to poll a queue. Having limited polling with spinning for a while is the best of both sides.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
More of my philosophy about my new inventions and more.. Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com> - 2022-02-17 11:02 -0800
Re: More of my philosophy about my new inventions and more.. Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-02-17 20:27 +0100
Re: More of my philosophy about my new inventions and more.. Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com> - 2022-02-17 11:41 -0800
Re: More of my philosophy about my new inventions and more.. Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-02-17 21:23 +0100
Re: More of my philosophy about my new inventions and more.. Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com> - 2022-02-17 13:28 -0800
Re: More of my philosophy about my new inventions and more.. Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-02-18 07:31 +0100
Re: More of my philosophy about my new inventions and more.. Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com> - 2022-02-18 07:58 -0800
Re: More of my philosophy about my new inventions and more.. Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-02-18 17:41 +0100
Re: More of my philosophy about my new inventions and more.. Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com> - 2022-02-18 08:56 -0800
Re: More of my philosophy about my new inventions and more.. Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com> - 2022-02-18 12:50 -0800
Re: More of my philosophy about my new inventions and more.. Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com> - 2022-02-17 11:44 -0800
Re: More of my philosophy about my new inventions and more.. Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com> - 2022-02-17 11:49 -0800
csiph-web