Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #6271
| From | World90 <d3@d3.d3> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads |
| Subject | More of my philosophy about how to prove the fuzziness of smartness.. |
| Date | 2021-01-25 20:17 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <runqk4$ugm$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
Hello, More of my philosophy about how to prove the fuzziness of smartness.. As you have just noticed i have just said the following about what is a genius and what is smartness: --- I have just read the following very interesting article from Livescience, i invite you to read it carefully: Genius: Can anybody be one? https://www.livescience.com/55028-what-makes-a-genius.html So i am a white arab, and i think i am a genius, and i will explain what is a genius and what is smartness: First you have to make a difference between IQ tests and smartness, but i think that the standard IQ tests are not testing correctly IQ, since i think there is a "probabilistic" process in the way we solve IQ tests, i mean that you can be able to see clearly the pattern with your fluid intelligence or you can be able to see the pattern in a fuzzy way or probabilistic way with your fluid intelligence and still be able to recognize it or not be able to recognize it, that means that even if you have an IQ of 160 you can still not see a complex pattern even if an IQ of 110 can see the same complex pattern in a fuzzy way or probabilistic way and be able to recognize it, so i think it is like deep learning networks. -- But i have to like prove this the fuzziness of smartness: To be able to prove it, i will start to prove it like the following: Notice that being artistic is also smartness, because i think that being artistic is being able to recognize with your brain a pattern(of music and such), and after that from the pattern recognized being able to for example play the recognized pattern with a guitar, but notice again that recognizing the pattern is also a smartness that is fuzzy, since you notice that the patterns of music that are recognized by the brain of an artist can become fuzziness since the music that is discovered can be less perfect in a fuzzy way than other music that is discovered, so this proves that being artistic is also like deep learning networks in action in the brain of the artist, so being artistic is being smartness, but this smartness is smartness of being artistic. So then i think that the other patterns in for example logical reasoning etc. of what we call smartness are also fuzzy. And i think that what we call mathematical intuition is also being able to recognize with fluid intelligence a full pattern from a fuzzy pattern, so mathematical intuition is smartness that is also fuzzy. Read the rest of my previous thoughts to understand: More of my philosophy about what is it to be a genius.. I have just read the following very interesting article from Livescience, i invite you to read it carefully: Genius: Can anybody be one? https://www.livescience.com/55028-what-makes-a-genius.html So i am a white arab, and i think i am a genius, and i will explain what is a genius and what is smartness: First you have to make a difference between IQ tests and smartness, but i think that the standard IQ tests are not testing correctly IQ, since i think there is a "probabilistic" process in the way we solve IQ tests, i mean that you can be able to see clearly the pattern with your fluid intelligence or you can be able to see the pattern in a fuzzy way or probabilistic way with your fluid intelligence and still be able to recognize it or not be able to recognize it, that means that even if you have an IQ of 160 you can still not see a complex pattern even if an IQ of 110 can see the same complex pattern in a fuzzy way or probabilistic way and be able to recognize it, so i think it is like deep learning networks. About more of my philosophy about smartness.. You will think that smartness is much more genetical, but this is a big mistake, since i think i am smart and i will explain: If you want to climb a big mountain, there is two ways: You can climb the big mountain or you can make the big mountain small in height so that to climb it, so when you are smart you will take a look at the constraints that make smartness much less expressive, and those constraints that make smartness much less expressive is like making the mountain small in height so that to climb it. Read more my following thoughts to understand: More philosophy about smartness and abstraction and complexity.. So i will start by asking a question: Is the way of learning by abstraction an efficient way ? So when you are smart you will quickly notice that we have to take into account the "context" of the way of learning by abstraction, and when you are smart you will notice that the way of learning by abstraction is also to reduce complexity, but when you take into account the context you will notice that learning by abstraction is a also a "specialization" and it is also an efficient way of learning when we measure it inside the "context" of abstraction that is the reality, so then we have not to be pessimistic about learning by the efficient way of abstraction since, first, it reduces the complexity and, second, even if we are not understanding the complexity behind the abstraction, learning by abstraction is also an efficient specialization that is efficient for adaptability, so we have to know how to balance between those that are required to understand the complexity behind the abstraction and those that are required to learn by the way of abstraction that is a specialization. More philosophy about the way of learning by abstraction.. I will give you an example so that you understand, so if you ask what is the way of learning by abstraction, look at my following tutorial where i am presenting my methodology that, first, permits to model the synchronization primitives of parallel programs with logic primitives with If-then-OR-AND so that to make it easy to translate to petri nets so that to detect deadlocks in parallel programs, please take a look at it because this tutorial of mine is the way of learning by abstraction: How to analyse parallel applications with Petri Nets https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/how-to-analyse-parallel-applications-with-petri-nets I think i am smart and i will explain more what is smartness.. So that you understand me more, let us say that you are measuring a human IQ, so if it is high human IQ , this value is a measure that is relative to the other human IQs, so you will say that this high IQ is much better at adaptability than the other humans, but it is not correct measure, because even science and technology have constraints that constrain(or limit greatly) the expressiveness of human IQs, so then we can not say that a high human IQ is better at adaptability than the other humans.. More philosophy about how to measure human IQ or human smartness.. I think i am smart, and i will talk about how to measure human IQs or human smartness, first you have to know that you can measure relatively or absolutely, so if you measure the IQ of a human, you will give a value of IQ that is "relative" to the distribution of IQs of humans, so can we ask if it is the right way to measure human IQs? i think it is not, because there is a "very" important thing that is missing, and it is that you have to also measure IQ or smartness relatively to the "constraints" in our reality that constrain(or limit) human IQ or human smartness, and i think this will give a much more realistic measure of human IQs or human smartness, so if you are really smart you will start by searching what are those constraints in the reality that constrain human IQs or human smartness, because this way you will become really smart. Let me give an example about how to measure IQs or smartness.. So if you are really smart you will give a smart example so that people can understand, so here it is: If i say: 2 + 2 = 4 So you will notice that this equality is also constrained by constraints of reality, since for example you are noticing that it is not so mathematically expressive, so this not mathematically expressive is also constraining human IQ or human smartness, since if you understand and learn this mathematical equality, another person will quickly do the same, so the other person will adapt quickly to this level of smartness, so now you are noticing the smart idea, it is that even science and technology are constrained the same way, and this constraints on science and technology constrain or limit the expressiveness of high human IQs or high level of smartness so that other lower level human IQs or smartness can attain the level of adaptability of high human IQs, this is what is happening in our today world, and if you are smart you will notice that there is something else that is happening and it is that abstraction of complexity that reduce the complexity is making others not understanding the complexity behind the abstraction and this is not so efficient. Here is more about the constraints on science and technology: Is Science Going To End? Read more here: https://philosophynow.org/issues/68/Is_Science_Going_To_End And read also the following The Industrial Era Ended, and So Will the Digital Era Read more here: https://hbr.org/2018/07/the-industrial-era-ended-and-so-will-the-digital-era More political philosophy about what is smartness.. I give you an example so that you understand: If i give the following three words: I, love, you. It is not the same as if i give the following five words: I, love, you, very, much So you are noticing that the five words permit a more sophisticated expressiveness, and notice that i am saying more sophisticated, since the five words bring more efficiency, and this bringing more efficiency is also what we call smartness, but notice that this smartness is brought by using the "tool" that is composed of the five words, so the tool that is our english language brings smartness, so then we have to be convinced by the fact that the tool like internet brings a much more efficiency and this much more efficiency brings much more smartness, so now you are noticing that smartness is not only genetical or cultural, but it is also the smartness of using the tool, and this is a very important thing, since the tool can be powerful and it can advance very much a human and can make a human really smart. So you have to understand that we are also in an Era of powerful tools such as internet that can advance very much a human and that can make a human really smart. And now i will ask a philosophical question: How to manage efficiently complexity ? I think you can manage complexity by the “divide and rule” approach to management, which also leads to hierarchical division of large organisations, or wich also leads to the Division of "labour", you can read more about the Division of labour here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Division_of_labour Also you can manage complexity by using constraints, such as laws, road rules and commercial standards, all of which limit the potential for harmful interactions to occur, also you can manage complexity by using higher layers of abstraction such as in computer programming, and we can also follow the efficient rule of: "Do less and do it better" that can also use higher level layers of abstraction to enhance productivity and quality, this rule is good for productivity and quality, and about productivity: I have also just posted about the following thoughts from the following PhD computer scientist: https://lemire.me/blog/about-me/ Read more here his thoughts about productivity: https://lemire.me/blog/2012/10/15/you-cannot-scale-creativity/ And i think he is making a mistake: Since we have that Productivity = Output/Input But better human training and/or better tools and/or better human smartness and/or better human capacity can make the Parallel productivity part much bigger that the Serial productivity part, so it can scale much more (it is like Gustafson's Law). And it looks like the following: About parallelism and about Gustafson’s Law.. Gustafson’s Law: • If you increase the amount of work done by each parallel task then the serial component will not dominate • Increase the problem size to maintain scaling • Can do this by adding extra complexity or increasing the overall problem size Scaling is important, as the more a code scales the larger a machine it can take advantage of: • can consider weak and strong scaling • in practice, overheads limit the scalability of real parallel programs • Amdahl’s law models these in terms of serial and parallel fractions • larger problems generally scale better: Gustafson’s law Load balance is also a crucial factor. So read my following thoughts about the Threadpool to notice that my Threadpool that scales very well does Load balance well: --- About the Threadpool.. I have just read the following: Concurrency - Throttling Concurrency in the CLR 4.0 ThreadPool https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/archive/msdn-magazine/2010/september/concurrency-throttling-concurrency-in-the-clr-4-0-threadpool But i think that both the methodologies from Microsoft of the Hill Climbing and of the Control Theory using band pass filter or match filter and discrete Fourier transform have a weakness, there weakness is that they are "localized" optimization that maximize the throughput , so they are not fair, so i don't think i will implement them, so then you can use my following invention of an efficient Threadpool engine with priorities that scales very well (and you can use a second Threadpool for IO etc.): https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well And here is my other Threadpool engine with priorities: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/threadpool-engine-with-priorities And read my following previous thoughts to understand more: About the strategy of "work depth-first; steal breadth-first".. I have just read the following webpage: Why Too Many Threads Hurts Performance, and What to do About It https://www.codeguru.com/cpp/sample_chapter/article.php/c13533/Why-Too-Many-Threads-Hurts-Performance-and-What-to-do-About-It.htm Also I have just looked at the following interesting video about Go scheduler and Go concurrency: Dmitry Vyukov — Go scheduler: Implementing language with lightweight concurrency https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-K11rY57K7k And i have just read the following webpage about the Threadpool of microsoft .NET 4.0: https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/jennifer/2009/06/26/work-stealing-in-net-4-0/ And as you are noticing the first web link above is speaking about the strategy of "work depth-first; steal breadth-first" , but we have to be more smart because i think that this strategy, that is advantageous for cache locality, works best for recursive algorithms, because a thread is taking the first task and after that the algorithm is recursive, so it will put the childs tasks inside the local work-stealing queue, and the other threads will start to take from the work-stealing queue, so the work will be distributed correctly, but as you will notice that this strategy works best for recursive algorithms, but when you you iteratively start many tasks, i think we will have much more contention on the work-stealing queue and this is a weakness of this strategy, other than that when it is not a recursive algorithm and the threads are receiving from the global queue so there will be high contention on the global queue and this is not good. MIT's Cilk and Go scheduler and the Threadpool of Microsoft and Intel® C++ TBB are using this strategy of "work depth-first; steal breadth-first". And as you are noticing that they are giving more preference to cache locality than scalability. But in my following invention of a Threadpool that scales very well i am giving more preference to scalability than to cache locality: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well Other than that when you are doing IO with my Threadpool, you can use asychronous IO by starting a dedicated thread to IO to be more efficient, or you can start another of my Threadpool and use it for tasks that uses IO, you can use the same method when threads of the my Threadpool are waiting or sleeping.. Other than that for recursion and the stack overflow problem you can convert your function from a recursive to iterative to solve the problem of stack overflow. Other than that to be able to serve a great number of internet connections or TCP/IP socket connections you can use my Threadpool with my powerful Object oriented Stackful coroutines library for Delphi and FreePascal here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/object-oriented-stackful-coroutines-library-for-delphi-and-freepascal --- And enhancing productivity is also related to my following powerful product that i have designed and implemented(that can also be applied to organizations): https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/universal-scalability-law-for-delphi-and-freepascal Please read the following about Applying the Universal Scalability Law to organisations: https://blog.acolyer.org/2015/04/29/applying-the-universal-scalability-law-to-organisations/ Yet more philosophy about quality control and quality.. So first you have to define quality(read below about it) and second you have to construct quality and third you have to control quality. So, I have just read the following about the Central Limit Theorem (I understood it), i invite you to read it carefully: https://www.probabilitycourse.com/chapter7/7_1_2_central_limit_theorem.php So as you are noticing this Central Limit Theorem is so important for quality control, read the following to notice it(I also understood Statistical Process Control (SPC)): An Introduction to Statistical Process Control (SPC) https://www.engineering.com/AdvancedManufacturing/ArticleID/19494/An-Introduction-to-Statistical-Process-Control-SPC.aspx Also PERT networks are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks" (PAN) because the duration of some or all of the arcs are independent random variables with known probability distribution functions, and have finite ranges. So PERT uses the central limit theorem (CLT) to find the expected project duration. So, i have designed and implemented my PERT++ that that is important for quality, please read about it and download it from my website here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/pert-an-enhanced-edition-of-the-program-or-project-evaluation-and-review-technique-that-includes-statistical-pert-in-delphi-and-freepascal --- So I have provided you in my PERT++ with the following functions: function NormalDistA (const Mean, StdDev, AVal, BVal: Extended): Single; function NormalDistP (const Mean, StdDev, AVal: Extended): Single; function InvNormalDist(const Mean, StdDev, PVal: Extended; const Less: Boolean): Extended; For NormalDistA() or NormalDistP(), you pass the best estimate of completion time to Mean, and you pass the critical path standard deviation to StdDev, and you will get the probability of the value Aval or the probability between the values of Aval and Bval. For InvNormalDist(), you pass the best estimate of completion time to Mean, and you pass the critical path standard deviation to StdDev, and you will get the length of the critical path of the probability PVal, and when Less is TRUE, you will obtain a cumulative distribution. So as you are noticing from my above thoughts that since PERT networks are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks" (PAN) because the duration of some or all of the arcs are independent random variables with known probability distribution functions, and have finite ranges. So PERT uses the central limit theorem (CLT) to find the expected project duration. So then you have to use my above functions that are Normal distribution and inverse normal distribution functions, please look at my demo inside my zip file to understand better how i am doing it: You can download and read about my PERT++ from my website here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/pert-an-enhanced-edition-of-the-program-or-project-evaluation-and-review-technique-that-includes-statistical-pert-in-delphi-and-freepascal More of my philosophy about Niklaus Wirth and about the good taste.. Having good taste involves knowing what is truly excellent or of genuine value. Read here to notice it: What Is Good Taste? https://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2014/03/what-is-good-taste.html And as you have just noticed i have just posted the following thoughts of Niklaus Wirth (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niklaus_Wirth): https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/h_xKwu2gM44 And i think that Niklaus Wirth is too pessimistic on the above thoughts Since you have to know that an efficient education can permit to give you a good taste so that to be able to be efficiently selective, and this is valid for both the consumers and the producers of products or services. And more of my philosophy about the good taste.. So let us look in the dictionary at what is the taste, it says the following: "The taste is the sense by which the qualities and flavour of a substance are distinguished by the taste buds." Read here in the dictionary to notice it: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/taste But when you are smart you will also notice that there is also the intellectual taste from culture or genetics, i mean that when you are genetically more rational and more smart you will notice that this more rational and more smart is also intellectual taste since with it you are able to be more efficiently selective of your knowledge, so it permits you to enhance quality, and this is also the same for culture, i mean when you enhance more your culture it enhances your intellectual taste and it permits you to be more efficiently selective of your knowledge, so it permits you to enhance quality. So as you are noticing that the intellectual taste is so important.. Here is another new proverb of mine that shows more what is wisdom.. I think i am also a philosopher, and i can also invent proverbs, here is yet another new smart proverb of mine: "There is an important difference between the appearance of a reality and the truth of a reality, this is why in science you have not to be confident with the appearances, since in science you have to understand the truth, so, to be able to understand the truth you have to know how to be patience before understanding the truth and not to rush in like a fool by lack of wisdom " And here is another proverb of mine: "Wich one has to precede, being able to reason correctly or to rush in like a fool without being able to reason correctly? when you are able to answer correctly this question, you will understand a very important principle that makes you much more wise." Here is another new proverb of mine.. "A wise man is by "logical" analogy like the person that knows how to prepare a good meal from ingredients, since a wise man is the one that knows how to prepare a well organized society or well organized global world from the people." And here is my other new proverb: Note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as: "the act or process of perfecting" Read here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection This is the definition of perfection above that I use below in my explanation of my new proverb. Here is all my explanation of my new proverb below: My new proverb comes to me from the essence of morality that I explained to you in my political philosophy that I wrote in English, since in morality we are pushed towards the pretty tomorrow because we are aware of this pretty perfume that is the perfection that pushes us or encourages us to be or allows us to become perfect or greatly perfect. Read about it here on my thoughts of my political philosophy about morality: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4 So here is my new proverb: "Life is like the pretty perfume that calls us to be a pretty tomorrow!" So notice carefully my smart play on words in my new proverb, i think it's smart, and you have to know that the future perfection depends on the present perfection, so when today we are responsibility to be the pretty perfection so that to build the pretty tomorrow, then the pretty perfection of today is part of the pretty tomorrow, and the "pretty perfume" in my new proverb is also the today pretty perfection, but you have to understand the symbolic which allows us to say that being this part of the pretty tomorrow is also like being the pretty tomorrow. It is what makes it a smart proverb. More philosophy about order and respect.. I have just read the following about the importance of respect for a society. i invite you to read it: https://steemit.com/sndbox/@teachblogger/the-importance-of-respect-for-a-society So read my following thoughts so that to understand more about respect and order: Note: I am saying below the following: "and order and respect can be considered pleasures of life", and the "can" indicates possibility. More philosophy about the traditional Japanese lifestyle.. So look carefully at the following video of everyday life in bygone days in Tokyo in year 1966: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvoZjbp9R1w I am a white arab and i think i am smart, and when i just looked at the above video , i have just detected an important "pattern" with my fluid intelligence, and it is that Japanese of year 1966 were people that were apt at knowing how to appreciate simple pleasures of life and how to appreciate order, so then they were knowing how to be respect too so that to be order, and order and respect can be considered pleasures of life, so i think that they were happy people, and knowing how to appreciate simple pleasures of life like were doing the Japanese of year 1966 is a very important rule in philosophy because it avoids disorder in a society, the second rule in philosophy that avoids disorder in a society is that you have to know how to be the "effort" of being order and responsability. So notice the first rule above, i mean the rule of you have to know how to appreciate simple pleasures of life since it bring happiness too, so look at the following american dream of Micheal Jackson and you will notice that Micheal Jackson has died of a Drug Overdose even if he has been very rich or he was rich, so i think he was a person that didn't know how to appreciate simple pleasures of life, so he was not a happy person even if he was very rich. Look at the following video to notice: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R73DZkM9X6U So how to appreciate simple pleasures of life ? read my following thoughts to know how: About the american dream and about the american negroes... Look carefully at the following video of a song about the american dream and about the american negroes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWJrPzAUzAs This video above also symbolizes the american dream and it also symbolizes the idiotic philosophy, so i think i am a philosopher and i will start by asking a smart question: Can we all men marry a beautiful women ? So from this kind of question you are feeling what is it to be a correct philosophy, i mean that not all men can marry a beautiful women, so now you are understanding that you have to be a philosopher that learns the way of philosophy, so look at the above video, so do you notice that the video is like calling the people to behave like in the above video, i mean it is like calling the people to become all of them rich so that to be happy or/and it is like calling all the people to have beautiful womens etc. so that to be happy, but this is an illogical philosophy that is not in accordance with a correct philosophy, since the philosophy above symbolizes the american dream that is not possible to make real for all people, so i think i am a philosopher, so what do you think that i say about it? i say that the goal and the meaning of human life is about happiness, and you have to make a difference between being happy without being rich and being rich and happy, because we can be happy without being rich, and how to be happy ? it is by understanding correctly my philosophy below, so here it is, and read it carefully: Here is a very simple arabic meal that is delicious and inexpensive, look at it carefully: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJ7_9qio8fs And this very simple arabic meal proves that you can be happy with simple pleasures of life, even if you don't have high quality pleasures, read my following writing of my philosophy to understand it: I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I invite you to look at the following interesting video, because it is also like philosophy, so look at it carefully and my thoughts about it are below: The story of my life - From a dream to reality https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wFsYY71wyk I think that this swedish women is an artist and photographer that is locally smart in what she is doing, since she is like creating pleasures of life by showing us her videos of the beautiful Sweden's nature, but the weakness of what she is doing is that this swedish women is not a philosopher like me, so she is not understanding correctly, because she is thinking that happiness comes from those high quality pleasures of life of the so beautiful Sweden's nature that she is showing in her videos, but i think it is a mistake, since not all people have those "high" quality pleasures of life, so in my philosophy(read about it below) i am explaining that happiness comes not only from pleasures of life, but it also comes from the alternance of being "hungry" for taking a rest and taking a rest or from the alternance of being hungry and eating a delicious meal, so happiness comes from the difficulties of life that make us more hungry for or make us appreciate much more the pleasures of life, so they make us more happy, and i think this is the secret of life, this is why i am saying the following in my philosophy: More philosophy about the great movie called Cast Away.. I invite you to look at the following short video of a great movie called Cast Away: Academy Award®-winning filmmaker Robert Zemeckis and two-time Oscar winner Tom Hanks reunite to explore the blessings and heartache of fate and the survival of the human spirit. Tom Hanks gives one of the towering screen performances of all time as Chuck Noland, a FedEx systems engineer whose ruled-by-the-clock existence abruptly ends when a harrowing plane crash leaves him isolated on a remote island. As Chuck struggles to survive, he finds that his own personal journey has only just begun... Look here at the following short video of this great movie called Cast Away: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zZ3UYd1UxA I think you have to look or look again at this great movie, because when you are smart you will notice that the movie also learns you the way of my philosophy below, i mean that Chuck Noland in the video(that is Tom Hanks) is getting like more and more hungry for our kind of civilization by being isolated on a remote island and he is learning to understand the way of my philosophy below about from where comes happiness and pleasures of life, because by being isolated on a remote island he is also learning to appreciate our kind civilization and this is also from where comes happiness, so you have to be smart by reading my following thoughts of my philosophy about from where comes happiness and pleasures of life and by at the same time making the logical analogy with the great movie above that we call Cast Away: So i will ask a philosophical question: More philosophy about the hypothetical and the reality.. Do we have to measure it absolutely or relatively ? This is an important question in philosophy: So how do we have to measure happiness ? and is happiness real ? So i think that the philosopher Albert Camus was not smart when he said that life is absurd, by saying the following: "Absurdism arises out of the tension between our desire for order, meaning and happiness and, on the other hand, the indifferent natural universe’s refusal to provide that." So what is the right way to measure it ? I think it is like science, since we are not yet perfect, so i think it is "hypothetical" to say that life is absurd like was saying the philosopher Albert Camus, because we have to to be pragmatic in science and measure it taking into account our "imperfections" and "limitations", so the are we happy must be measured in a pragmatic way, so then you can notice that my philosophy is more pragmatic, since it is explaining that happiness comes not only from pleasures of life, but it also comes from the alternance of being "hungry" for taking a rest and taking a rest or from the alternance of being hungry and eating a delicious meal, so happiness comes from the difficulties of life that make us more hungry for or make us appreciate much more the pleasures of life, so they make us more happy, and i think this is the secret of life, so then life is not absurd, since the meaning of life is that we are getting happiness from this kind of mechanism that looks like the alternance of the day and night from where comes beauty and a kind of pleasure, so then we have to be careful by being selective of the kind of pleasures of life that make us happy so that for example to not be too much materialism that causes problems. From where comes happiness and pleasures of life? It is like beauty of the alternance of the day and night, from this alternance of the day and night comes beauty and a kind of pleasure, so i think that happiness comes from this kind of alternance, i mean that for example you will get a great pleasure from eating a Moroccan Couscous Bidaoui(read about it below) when you are hungry, so from this alternance of being hungry and eating a Moroccan Couscous comes this great pleasure of life that gives happiness and that gives the meaning of life, so you have to know how to be this alternance , i mean when for example you work hard and after that you give yourself peace by taking a rest and you also give yourself a pleasure like eating a Moroccan Couscous Bidaoui, you will get a great pleasure, so you have to know how to be this alternance of being hard work and giving yourself peace by taking a rest, this is from where comes happiness and this is from where comes the meaning of human existence. More philosophy about do we have to measure it relatively or absolutely.. When you measure an IQ , you can measure it relatively to the distribution of other IQs, but is it the right measure? so this question is really important, since the philosopher Albert Camus was measuring the meaning and purpose of life by measuring it like absolutely by saying that human existence is absurd by saying: "Absurdism arises out of the tension between our desire for order, meaning and happiness and, on the other hand, the indifferent natural universe’s refusal to provide that." But i think this is a mistake, since in my philosophy i am measuring the meaning of human existence "relatively" to pleasures of life that are like "powerful" drugs that bring us more happiness and so they give meaning to human existence(since they are like powerful drugs) and they permit us to go forward towards more and more perfection and this going forward towards more and more perfection is also the goal of morality(read below my political philosophy about morality so that to understand it), so i think i am right by saying so, so then human existence is not absurd. And also don't forget to read my following philosophy about human existence.. I have just created a webpage on my website here about my philosophy about human existence, you can read it carefully here: https://scalable68.godaddysites.com/f/my-philosophy-about-human-existence Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
More of my philosophy about how to prove the fuzziness of smartness.. World90 <d3@d3.d3> - 2021-01-25 20:17 -0500
csiph-web