Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #6190
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads |
| Subject | Re: Read again, i correct a typo about hash function collision and scalability.. |
| Date | Tue, 22 Dec 2020 22:50:06 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 10 |
| Message-ID | <rrtpmf$ohj$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <ccf7026e-050f-45d7-9a07-8d8fadbe8382n@googlegroups.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Tue, 22 Dec 2020 21:50:07 -0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="abb7a2108cb3a29e244078e6db6104b6"; logging-data="25139"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18v3OxgCk0OXYqPUbHvstubyHuVPfebgps=" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:q59IjZhx40IvwmUViXpgbp+mt1w= |
| In-Reply-To | <ccf7026e-050f-45d7-9a07-8d8fadbe8382n@googlegroups.com> |
| Content-Language | de-DE |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.programming.threads:6190 |
Show key headers only | View raw
> in my following software projects can attain only a probability of 50% for a collision at around 77000 cores and and 77000 threads, so it is good for scalability even if i am not using a good 64 bit hash function, > (but i will soon upgrade them to a good 64 bit hash function), You have megalomania. There will never be a computer with 77.000 cores in shared memory. NUMA won't scale to that extend, M(O)ESI won't scale to that extent and the software also won't scale to that extent. sgi has dropped is massively parallel shared memory system with its NUMA- link-architecture because of that.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Read again, i correct a typo about hash function collision and scalability.. Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com> - 2020-12-22 13:40 -0800 Re: Read again, i correct a typo about hash function collision and scalability.. Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-12-22 22:50 +0100
csiph-web