Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #5448
| From | Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads |
| Subject | Re: Mutexes are faster then spinlocks |
| Date | 2020-01-05 17:53 +0100 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <qut4aj$161$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <5BnQF.827125$kBJ1.28344@fx12.am4> <qut3n1$9j5$1@news.albasani.net> |
This is rather stupid: https://docs.microsoft.com/de-de/windows/win32/api/synchapi/nf-synchapi-initializecriticalsectionandspincount
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Mutexes are faster then spinlocks Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-01-05 15:50 +0000
Re: Mutexes are faster then spinlocks Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-05 17:43 +0100
Re: Mutexes are faster then spinlocks Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-05 17:53 +0100
csiph-web