Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #5249
| Path | csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads |
| Subject | Re: Read again my "final" corrected post about about efficiency and performance.. |
| Date | Wed, 16 Oct 2019 20:14:19 +0200 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Lines | 25 |
| Message-ID | <qo7mls$j5c$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <a56ddc60-5f15-4dd4-b415-d4932b2313f9@googlegroups.com> <qo702n$63k$1@news.albasani.net> <qo7k1u$9cn$1@dont-email.me> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | news.albasani.net KWSwGw73foQLQbGsEEc8GSY/6E6dkReWpw4b0xsY/bs3co8OcsZWWVyyyXb43b4xriOvUl24KMauzO2yBWrLug== |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Wed, 16 Oct 2019 18:14:20 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | news.albasani.net; logging-data="eegUuJAGYWjVYHKGz4jEw/lDKTOFflect4+DVQIbrUFVghHeip5PTsLfXHmrSyVLV5EXOw66ojcygCUkSO6tXNkIbWl5+PJg0JZNd/vKhzJ+wkYTnILleS/hMAQ1fM3n"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.2 |
| In-Reply-To | <qo7k1u$9cn$1@dont-email.me> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:lZXODVAhqlWbe55Ek38aumfgx9I= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.programming.threads:5249 |
Show key headers only | View raw
> I think i am also smart, so i have just quickly found a solution that is > scalable and that is not your solution, so it needs my hashtable that > scales very ... A scaling hashtable is easy. > ... scales very well and it needs my fully scalable FIFO queue that > i have invented. That's also easy. > But i will not patent it, .. There's prior art for both. As someone else told you: your ideas aren't new. > because i will let you patent yours since i have seen you speaking on > the newsgroup of C++ about it. I'd have no problem if you show my idea as prior art. So go on. > But my solution is not Lockfree, it uses locks and it is scalable. A locking LRU-list is never scalable.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Read again my "final" corrected post about about efficiency and performance.. aminer68@gmail.com - 2019-10-14 14:18 -0700
Re: Read again my "final" corrected post about about efficiency and performance.. Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2019-10-16 13:48 +0200
Re: Read again my "final" corrected post about about efficiency and performance.. Wisdom90 <d@d.d> - 2019-10-16 13:29 -0400
Re: Read again my "final" corrected post about about efficiency and performance.. Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2019-10-16 20:14 +0200
Re: Read again my "final" corrected post about about efficiency and performance.. Wisdom90 <d@d.d> - 2019-10-16 14:19 -0400
Re: Read again my "final" corrected post about about efficiency and performance.. Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2019-10-17 05:07 +0200
Re: Read again my "final" corrected post about about efficiency and performance.. Wisdom90 <d@d.d> - 2019-10-16 14:20 -0400
csiph-web