Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4968
| From | Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads |
| Subject | Read again.. |
| Date | 2019-03-25 17:01 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <q7bq5d$3u8$12@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
Hello... As you have noticed i am a white arab, and i am a more serious computer programmer and i am also an "inventor" of many scalable algorithms and there implementations, here is my new invention: I have just "invented" a "highly" scalable Parallel Sort library for shared memory architectures that supports a highly scalable Mergesort and a highly scalable Quicksort and a highly scalable Heapsort. I think that this new invention of mine is the "best" one in shared memory architectures because it also uses my other inventions of a fully scalable FIFO queue and a fully scalable Threadpool. So i think i will sell it to Google or to Microsoft or to Embarcadero or such big software companies. Also i have have just invented the following Parallel Sort Library that supports a new and more efficient Parallel merge algorithms that improves the worst-case performance: My algorithm of finding the median of Parallel merge of my Parallel Sort Library that you will find here in my website: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/parallel-sort-library Is O(log(min(|A|,|B|))), where |A| is the size of A, since the binary search is performed within the smaller array and is O(lgN). But the new algorithm of finding the median of parallel merge of my Parallel Sort Library is O(log(|A|+|B|)), which is slightly worse. With further optimizations the order was reduced to O(log(2*min(|A|,|B|))), which is better, but is 2X more work, since both arrays may have to be searched. All algorithms are logarithmic. Two binary searches were necessary to find an even split that produced two equal or nearly equal halves. Luckily, this part of the merge algorithm is not performance critical. So, more effort can be spent looking for a better split. This new algorithm in the parallel merge balances the recursive binary tree of the divide-and-conquer and improve the worst-case performance of parallel merge sort. So stay tuned ! Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Read again.. Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com> - 2019-03-25 17:01 -0700
csiph-web