Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4955
| From | Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads |
| Subject | I am like a PhD researcher and i am competing against high-tech compagnies and against the best PhD researchers |
| Date | 2019-03-16 13:14 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <q6jleo$1me$11@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
Hello.. Read this: I am like a PhD researcher and i am competing against high-tech compagnies and against the best PhD researchers, because i am an inventor of many scalable algorithms and there implementations, read the following to noticed it: As you have noticed i am a white arab that is a gentleman type of person, I am also a more serious computer programmer that is an "inventor" of many scalable algorithms and there implementations, and i am able to dance a beautiful dance with high-tech companies such Microsoft and Google and Oracle and Embarcadero and such big high-tech software compagnies, because i am like a PhD researcher that is inventing scalable algorithms, and i also know how to "dance" a "beautiful" dance on the following USA beautiful song: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2s4slliAtQU&list=RD2s4slliAtQU&start_radio=1 This why i wrote the following poem to make you understand more my way: == Is a beautiful dance a romance ? Or is a beautiful dance a show of common sense ? A beautiful dance is not only an instinct Since beautifulness is feeling the essence Since beautifulness is a beautiful cadence Since beautifulness is also intelligence Since beautifulness is a beautiful dance of patience and tolerance Since beautifulness is a beautiful dance of transcendence So you have to know how to dance the beautiful dance To be able to "advance" by evidence. == So what is my new beautiful dance that i am dancing ? I have just invented the following algorithms that i will sell to high-tech big software compagnies: And as i said Scalable method for producer and consumer elimination is already patented, here it is: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7779165 But i have already "invented" the following scalable algorithms and there implementations that don't use elimination, here they are: - Fully Scalable FIFO queue both unbounded and bounded - Fully scalable LIFO stack that is unbounded - Fully scalable LIFO priority stack that is unbounded - Fully scalable FIFO priority queue that is unbounded with limited number of priorities(up to 25 or something like that). But as you have noticed the following invention is patented: Scalable method for producer and consumer elimination is already patented, here it is: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7779165 This invention of the elimination method has given the following invention that uses "elimination" that as i said is patented: Scalable Concurrent Priority Queue Algorithms http://people.csail.mit.edu/shanir/publications/SZ-priority.pdf And elimination method above that is "patented" has given a scalable lockfree LIFO stack and a scalable FIFO queue that use elimination, but the weakness of those algorithms that use elimination is that: if we have, say, bursts of push calls followed by bursts of pop calls, there will again be no elimination and therefore no parallelism. This is why i have "solved" this weakness or problem by revolutionizing computing by inventing my above scalable algorithms that are fully scalable, and my scalable algorithms above have permit me to invent a fully scalable Threadpool and fully scalable Threadpool with priorities, this is why my above scalable algorithms will revolutionize computing. So as you are noticing i am an inventor of many scalable algorithms. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
I am like a PhD researcher and i am competing against high-tech compagnies and against the best PhD researchers Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com> - 2019-03-16 13:14 -0700
csiph-web