Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4911
| From | Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads |
| Subject | About Energy efficiency.. |
| Date | 2019-01-28 10:33 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <q2nhtp$q11$6@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
Hello.. About Energy efficiency.. Energy efficiency isn’t just a hardware problem. Your programming language choices can have serious effects on the efficiency of your energy consumption. We dive deep into what makes a programming language energy efficient. As the researchers discovered, the CPU-based energy consumption always represents the majority of the energy consumed. What Pereira et. al. found wasn’t entirely surprising: speed does not always equate energy efficiency. Compiled languages like C, C++, Rust, and Ada ranked as some of the most energy efficient languages out there, and Java and FreePascal are also good at Energy efficiency. Read more here: https://jaxenter.com/energy-efficient-programming-languages-137264.html RAM is still expensive and slow, relative to CPUs And "memory" usage efficiency is important for mobile devices. So Delphi and FreePascal compilers are also still "useful" for mobile devices, because Delphi and FreePascal are good if you are considering time and memory or energy and memory, and the following pascal benchmark was done with FreePascal, and the benchmark shows that C, Go and Pascal do rather better if you’re considering languages based on time and memory or energy and memory. Read again here to notice it: https://jaxenter.com/energy-efficient-programming-languages-137264.html Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
About Energy efficiency.. Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com> - 2019-01-28 10:33 -0800
csiph-web