Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4636

About the essence of morality

Show all headers | View raw

Hello,

Read this:

About the essence of morality

More political philosophy now..

If you have noticed on my writing i said that:

1- Morality is reliability

And i said that:

2- Morality is reliability at best

And i said that:

3- Morality is perfection at best.

But you will have the tendency to say that my above definitions
are not correct thinking, but here is my logical proof of my above 
definitions:

When i said that:

1- Morality is reliability


Look at the dictionary here:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reliability

It says that:

Reliability is: The quality or state of being reliable.

So when i say that: Morality is reliability that means that it can
be Morality is the quality of being reliability, so it is like a 
"concept" of reliability, that means that it can vary from 0% to 100%,
and we know that since morality is perfection at best from my following 
logical proof:

Because morality exists because we have to avoid the bad
And we have to avoid the bad by also trying to maximize at best the good
And trying to maximize at best the good is also called: perfection at best
So morality is pushed towards absolute perfection
So that to be able to solve all our problems
And be absolute happiness that is the goal
But morality of today must at least be a decent morality
To avoid desorder and violence inside the system

And we know that it is inherent to maximizing at best the good that
it is also minimizing at best "failures", so i think my above logical 
proof is correct.

So when i say above that:  Reliability is the quality of being reliable,
it means that the quality of being reliable is also measured by 
measuring prefection at best, because being reliability is also
solving the problem to be able to be perfection at best.

Also when i say Morality is reliability, it means that it is not only
that reliability is the quality of being reliable, but it is
also a state of being reliable, because as i said in my above logical proof:

"But morality of today must at least be a decent morality
To avoid desorder and violence inside the system"

That means that reliability that is the quality of being reliable must 
be at least decent morality, because without being at least decent 
morality we can not call it morality, because there is like a constrain 
over morality that must be at least decent morality to be able to call 
it morality.

Now i said also that:


And i said that:

2- Morality is reliability at best

And i said that:


3- Morality is perfection at best.



And that can be understood by my above proof and my above writing.


More political philosophy now..

I will speak about an important subject in political philosophy:

As you have noticed beauty and love has been created by wildness of 
nature, and after that in the past since perfection was not enough to 
ensure a decent morality , that is a decent perfection, humans have 
behaved more violently with wars and by practicing slavery etc, so in 
that past people were suffering more desorder and violence etc, so i 
think we have to be wiser by looking at our actual morality that is 
perfection at best,and to be able to judge it more "wisely", so do we 
have to be pessimistic of our morality, i don't think so, because there 
is a also  a big constrain that morality has to be at least a decent 
morality that is a decent perfection to avoid desorder and violence 
inside the system, but here comes an important question: How to judge 
that it is a decent morality ? here again there is also interpretations 
of neo-nazism that is too violent that don't know how to tune
perfection correctly, because neo-nazism is racism and it is extremism 
of "perfection" this is why they are discriminating too much, and this 
is not perfection at best that is morality, because perfection(and thus 
morality) is also knowing how to maximize at best success by minimizing 
at best failures, here again to be successful at minimizing the failures
you have to "prioritize", this is why neo-nazism must know how
to accept the right "imperfections" to be able to be "correct" 
perfection, this is why countries such as Canada and other european
countries are accepting arab immigrants even if some arab immigrants
are less beautiful than white europeans, because beautifulness is
interpreted as being less important than the fact that arab
immigrants are useful for economic growth and for the the social system 
etc. and this is morality that prioritize to be able to be successful,
this is why neo-nazism that is too violent towards immigrants is not
correct morality that knows how to manage itself, so i don't
agree with neo-nazism and such idelogies that contain many bugs.




Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

About the essence of morality Sky89 <a@a.a> - 2018-09-06 20:04 -0700

csiph-web