Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4565

Still about quality

Show all headers | View raw

Hello....

Read this:


I am a white arab who speaks and writes english and french and arabic

Still about quality

As you have noticed growth in France will lower
the unemployment in a significant way, but consumption
is also a way in economics to lower unemployment
more, but there is also another way to reduce unemployment is also to 
build quality products and services like in Germany to be more 
competitive and sell more locally and sell more globally to other 
countries, so I think France must also pay attention to the education 
sector that should become more efficient and of a better quality,
because innovation and quality are dependent on it! and in
being more effective in economics and education France will attract more 
and more smart people who innovate more and who create quality and 
growth, but I think that France is better "aware" today to face its 
challenges and I think it is able to meet them.

Still on France ..

I understand better the United States, and I also know how
to adopt the best of the United States, you in France you
have a tendency to insist too much on the fact that arabs of the Maghreb
do not integrate better and that they should integrate better, but I do 
not agree with the method, because I am a different mentality, and I 
think it is necessary to bring "indirectly those arabs to integrate 
better, and this "indirectly" it is this entrepreneurial spirit that 
wants to bring the president Macron, because since the private sector of 
France is of 75%, and that the private sector is important, then it is 
necessary to educate better and correctly those arabs of France to be 
able for them to be more efficient and more entrepreneurial and to be 
able for them to create companies too, and also France has to be more 
positive like Macron and show those arabs of France that France is more 
positive, from there "indirectly" the arabs of France will want  to 
build France and to integrate better in France. I think Macron is smart 
and he understands my ideas better.

I said below that:

"the french political party that is called FN is also more idealistim 
that contradicts itself with pragmatism and realism"

I mean that this racial idealism of the FN, as the fact of
wanting to become 100% racially European white is also more idealism 
that contradicts itself with pragmatism and realism.

On the entrepreneurial spirit ..

I think that in France you have to understand well the president Macron, 
Macron wants to bring and develop an entrepreneurial spirit of
people of France, especially that in France the private sector is at 75%
of workforce and the public sector is only 25%, in Algeria the public 
sector is at 35% of workforce, so we should not go through a thousand 
ways, president Macron knows that the pessimism of the far right party 
of the FN is bad, so Macron is more positive and I think we need to be 
more positive, because Macron knows that France is able to solve its 
problems in an intelligent way, I give you an example: the FN
says that it's tired of arabs of France, and that people who voted FN do 
not want anymore arabs, but Macron understands the finesse of politics
and he knows he has to be smart because immigration is good
for economic growth etc. that's why Macron is more
"realistic",  because for him the FN is also more idealism that 
contradicts itself with pragmatism and realism, that's why
I find Macron intelligent.

I think that we have not to be pessimistic about France, because
look at its growth and look at its other economic indicators:

First look at the growth of France here:

"Today's growth remains lower than the one that prevailed during the 
period 1975-2007, with a rate of 2.1% per year on average," observes 
Yannick L'Horty, a professor at the university. Paris-East - 
Marne-la-Vallée. However, it helps to increase the number of employees 
in the private sector, "so that unemployment will probably start to 
decline, at a very measured pace . "

and look also at this about France:

According to Bpifrance's semi-annual business survey, published on 
Monday, 41% of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) report 
recruitment difficulties, an increase of seven points over a year. This 
indicator has never been higher since 2002. This situation reflects the 
inadequacy of supply and demand for employment. The government wants to 
remedy this , through its Skills Investment Plan (CIP), which plans to 
train by the year 2022 two million low-skilled people or remote from the 
world of work. But, as Mr. Martin points out, this program "has not yet 
produced its effects" since it is still in its infancy.

Read more here to notice it:

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lemonde.fr%2Femploi%2Farticle%2F2018%2F07%2F25%2Fle-nombre-de-chomeurs-a-augmente-de-0-1-au-second-trimestre-2018_5335727_1698637.html

So i think France is on the right path, and France must also balance the 
budget and i think that France is capable of doing it.

Also here is my other thoughts of what France can also do:

I observed more closely the model of for example the French system,
and I found that contrarily to England, for example the weight of the 
public service in France is much more than that of England,  so what can 
we also do in France to unlock  economic wrowth and reduce the rate of 
unemployment? i think there is another solution that is reduce the size 
of the state to increase public revenue too, and also "reduce" taxes, 
because it is agreed that a lower taxes mechanically stimulates growth 
by the effect of the "multiplier "tax effect": indeed, it results in an 
increase in households or corporate profits, which favors consumption 
and/or investment, and therefore, indirectly, the production and 
employment, so it reduces unemployment.

I have to be more precise about USA:

I said before on my previous post that:

"At the monetary policy level, inject or withdraw a mass
monetary policies help to control inflation and to stimulate
the economy by credit which result in more overall spending which
it leads to economic growth and more investment which is beneficial for 
growth , except that monetary policy has a weakness if the borrowers are 
too much at risk of bankruptcy as was also the case in the united states 
in the crisis of year 2000. "

Here is the proof, read the following:

In 2001, when the recession hit the US economy, the Fed lowered the 
federal funds rate, increasing the liquidity in the economy. The 
borrowers were mainly those without jobs and income to back these loans, 
to buy houses. The easy credit plus upward spiral of home prices, made 
investments in high-yielding subprime mortgages increase further.

Read more here:

Reasons For The Late 2000s Financial Crisis

https://themarketmogul.com/reasons-for-the-late-2000s-financial-crisis/

So reread my following thoughts:

About offshoring and immigration and macroeconomics..

I am a white Arab, and here is my questions and my answers about
offshoring and immigration and macroeconomics, read my following thoughts:

Questions:

What do i think about offshoring and macroeconomics?

Answer:

At the monetary policy level, inject or withdraw a mass
monetary policies help to control inflation and to stimulate
the economy by credit which result in more overall spending which
it leads to economic growth and more investment which is beneficial for 
growth , except that monetary policy has a weakness if the borrowers are 
too much at risk of bankruptcy as was also the case in the united states 
in the crisis of year 2000.

Also the second lever is the Keynes tax policy:

Keynes recommends using an expansionary fiscal policy in case
recession: reduce taxes and increase the state. In case of inflation, he 
recommends doing the opposite.

The other criticism I make on the far right political parties, is that
the far right makes us think offshoring as being just bad, but I do not 
agree with them, because read the following:

Offshoring increases demand for more workers
"qualified" and also have a significant positive effect on
productivity, in Canada it is an increase in the "productivity" of
order of about 10%, also according to some recent research
the Offshoring of materials and services have both a
positive and not negligible effect on productivity.

When it comes to the repercussion on employment, the majority of 
empirical studies suggest that the general repercussions of offshoring 
on the employment levels are low (Amiti and Wei 2005, Mankiw and Swagel 
2006).

For proof, read the following document:

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww150.statcan.gc.ca%2Fn1%2Fpub%2F11f0027m%2F2008055%2Fs6-fra.htm


And about immigration now:

Look at this following video about:

Why Does the USA Need More IMMIGRANTS?

You will notice that the West "needs" immigrants because they are also
good for economic "growth".

But please look carefully at the following video to understand more:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmRgnDrhE9o


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Still about quality Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> - 2018-08-17 13:29 -0400

csiph-web