Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4556

I correct a last typo, read again..

Show all headers | View raw

Hello..

Read this:


I correct a last typo, read again..

About offshoring and immigration and macroeconomics..

I am a white Arab, and here is my questions and my answers about
offshoring and immigration and macroeconomics, read my following thoughts:

Questions:

What do i think about offshoring and macroeconomics?

Answer:


At the monetary policy level, inject or withdraw a mass
monetary policies help to control inflation and to stimulate
the economy by credit which result in more overall spending which
it leads to economic growth and more investment which is beneficial for 
growth , except that monetary policy has a weakness if the borrowers are 
too much at risk of bankruptcy as was also the case in the united states 
in the crisis of years 2000.

Also the second lever is the Keynes tax policy:

Keynes recommends using an expansionary fiscal policy in case
recession: reduce taxes and increase the state. In case of inflation, he 
recommends doing the opposite.

The other criticism I make on the far right political parties, is that
the far right makes us think offshoring as being just bad, but I do not 
agree with them, because read the following:

Offshoring increases demand for more workers
"qualified" and also have a significant positive effect on
productivity, in Canada it is an increase in the "productivity" of
order of about 10%, also according to some recent research
the Offshoring of materials and services have both a
positive and not negligible effect on productivity.

When it comes to the repercussion on employment, the majority of 
empirical studies suggest that the general repercussions of offshoring 
on the employment levels are low (Amiti and Wei 2005, Mankiw and Swagel 
2006).

For proof, read the following document:

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww150.statcan.gc.ca%2Fn1%2Fpub%2F11f0027m%2F2008055%2Fs6-fra.htm

I observed more closely the model of for example the French system,
and I found that contrarily to England, for example the weight of the 
public service in France is much more than that of England,  but what 
disturb me the most is that this French model tends to create between 0 
and 1% of economic growth which seems to me problematic because this 
very low growth rate in France can not compensate for the high birth 
rate that creates 150,000 new workers returning new to the job market 
every year and this tends to create a high rate of unemployment and is 
not able to lower the rate unemployment and this too has created a large 
debt and continues to create deficits and debt, and this seems to me 
problematic for France , so what to do in France to unlock growth
economic and reduce the rate of unemployment? i think there is a 
solution that is reduce the size of the state to increase public revenue 
too, and also "reduce" taxes, because it is agreed that a lower taxes
mechanically stimulates growth by the effect of the "multiplier
"tax effect": indeed, it results in an increase in households or 
corporate profits, which favors consumption and/or investment, and 
therefore, indirectly, the production and employment, so it reduces 
unemployment.


Read the rest of my thoughts that i have extended:

About populism..

You are noticing that we are getting more and more into populism in
some western countries..

But what is the cause of this populism ?

I think that there is some misunderstanding between Democrats
and Republicans in USA, for example Democrats know about
the problem of globalisation that is because of the low living 
conditions of China and third world countries they are capable of 
providing lower price products than the western countries , this causes 
also many industries of western countries to move to to China and to 
third world countries to be able to be competitive. But Republicans are 
not understanding Democrats, because Democrats know about this problem
of globalisation and they say that USA "must" create enough high value 
and high quality products like in Germany to solve a big part of the 
this problem of globalisation, thus the that lower class and middle 
class also  has to adapt by being more skilled and more educated to be 
able to be this more quality and be more competitive, this is what was 
lacking the in USA, this is why Democrats are not in accordance with 
republicans, because they say that USA has to be more inventive and more 
educated and more skilled to be able to solve this kind of problems of 
globalisation, but governance of republicans of USA is based on this 
populism that is not in accordance with what Democrats want, France and 
other western countries have this same problem, please read my above
writing on France and Offshoring.


And about immigration now:

Look at this following video about:

Why Does the USA Need More IMMIGRANTS?

You will notice that the West "needs" immigrants because they are also
good for economic "growth".

But please look carefully at the following video to understand more:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmRgnDrhE9o


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

I correct a last typo, read again.. Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> - 2018-08-07 09:51 -0400

csiph-web